No Logo Available

PRIME PRAGATI TOWNSHIP PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Madhya Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, selecting the right builder is paramount to ensuring a smooth purchasing experience and securing a worthwhile investment. Today, we delve into the profile of Prime Pragati Township Private Limited, a builder with a notable presence in Madhya Pradesh. With one complaint against them and a legal case history that involves one loss and no victories, what does this mean for potential buyers? Let's explore the details.

Overview of the Legal Case History

Prime Pragati Township Private Limited’s legal encounters share some interesting insights. There is one complaint currently lodged against them and only one significant case documented, which they lost. Here’s a breakdown of details from the case:

  • Complaint Summary: The applicant claimed that the builder failed to execute development work on the plot they purchased and did not refund the paid consideration amount with interest.
  • Builder's Response: The builder countered …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Failure to Execute Development Work Disputes Over Payment and Documentation Compensation for Mental Distress

Analysis of the cases filed against Prime Pragati Township Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: the builder's failure to execute development work and disputes over payment and necessary documentation.

In the first type of case, the applicant claimed that the builder did not perform any development work on their plot. This points to a significant breach of contract and trust in the builder's ability to fulfill their obligations. Instead of addressing these grievances, the builder often countered with claims that the applicant had not paid the balance owed or provided required documents. This defensive strategy indicates a trend where the builder may have been attempting to shift the blame rather than acknowledging and rectifying their own shortcomings.

The common reasons people brought cases to court largely center around the builder’s inability to deliver on …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review