CIN | U70102DL2013PTC254547 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | OFFICE NO-B-05,252 ,NAZAR SINGH PLACE, SANT NAGAR EAST OF KAILASH , NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110065 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a real estate builder, buyers often seek a combination of credibility, reliability, and positive outcomes from previous legal pursuits. Primoris Properties Private Limited presents an interesting case study, especially given its track record in handling complaints. In this post, we will delve into their legal history, analyze the patterns in their cases, and provide comprehensive tips for potential buyers.
Overview of Primoris Properties Private Limited
Primoris Properties Private Limited operates predominantly in Rajasthan and has encountered a total of one complaint throughout its operational history. Impressively, the builder has won all the legal cases it has faced, with the exception of one, which was dismissed in favor of Primoris due to jurisdiction issues.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
Primoris Properties faced a single complaint where the appellant alleged that the builder had failed to complete certain development works and had obtained a completion certificate …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Primoris Properties Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into two primary themes: jurisdictional disputes and claims of incomplete development works. The first theme pertains to complaints regarding the builder's responsibility to complete development projects and the validity of the completion certificates issued. The second theme highlights conflicts regarding claims of development delays and the consequent legal battles that arise when opposing parties feel their grievances have not been adequately addressed.
The complaints were typically filed by buyers or regulatory bodies contesting perceived project delays, asserting that the builder failed to fulfill contractual obligations or questioning the legitimacy of certifications provided. In the cases reviewed, a common pattern emerged where buyers were dissatisfied with the completion timelines or believed that the builder operated outside the bounds of regulatory guidelines, leading them to pursue …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!