CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a builder for your next home or investment property, it's crucial to conduct comprehensive research—not just on the properties they have developed, but also on their track record in legal disputes and customer satisfaction. PRITHVI DEVELOPERS, operating mainly in Chhattisgarh and Gujarat, presents a noteworthy case to examine.
PRITHVI DEVELOPERS has been involved in six legal disputes with clients, and alarmingly, they have lost all six cases. This lack of wins raises questions regarding their business practices and compliance with regulations. The complaints primarily revolve around issues like inadequate construction quality, failure to provide promised amenities, and non-compliance with local real estate regulations.
Interestingly, PRITHVI DEVELOPERS has managed to settle a significant number of cases before they reached a final judgement through the Authorities. In these instances, the builder often claimed compliance with regulations, while the customers asserted that the builder had failed in multiple aspects of their commitments. The outcomes consistently favored consumers as the Authority made orders compelling PRITHVI DEVELOPERS to resolve issues. This pattern may indicate a reluctance from the builder to pursue litigation against unsatisfied clients, potentially to avoid further damage to their reputation.
Overall, PRITHVI DEVELOPERS’ history of legal disputes, combined with their track record of losing cases, raises red flags for potential buyers. Buyers should proceed with caution. Here are some tailored tips for prospective customers who consider purchasing from this builder:
In conclusion, while PRITHVI DEVELOPERS may provide attractive options in the real estate market in Chhattisgarh and Gujarat, potential buyers should exercise due diligence and proceed warily given their track record of complaint and unresolved issues.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Prithvi Developers, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects. The cases highlight a range of issues, which can be categorized into four primary topics: incomplete development and non-compliance, parking allotment disputes, quality of construction issues, and regulatory violations and penalties.
Many of the cases revolve around the builder's failure to complete projects as promised, with complaints regarding the lack of boundary walls, inadequate drainage, and unfulfilled commitments to beautify public spaces. This suggests a prevalent pattern of neglect in the development phase, which likely contributed to the builder's losses in these cases.
Parking allotment disputes constitute another major theme, with multiple applicants claiming that they were not provided with covered parking despite their expectations. The builder's defense often revolved around their assertion that no separate payment was received for parking, indicating a potential miscommunication or misunderstanding of contractual obligations.
The quality of construction was also frequently called into question, with various claimants reporting seepage and cracks in their flats due to what they alleged was poor construction quality. The builder's position on this issue was inconsistent, as they sometimes denied any deficiencies in quality, while at other times they agreed to make repairs, highlighting an unclear internal standard for construction excellence.
Finally, regulatory violations and penalties emerged as a critical concern, with the builder facing action for non-compliance with the RERA Act, particularly for late registration of their projects and failure to furnish required documentation. This exposes a significant vulnerability in their operational processes and adherence to industry regulations.
The common triggers for litigation in these cases primarily involve customer dissatisfaction with incomplete developments, disputes over promised amenities like parking, and allegations of subpar construction. The builder's losses can be attributed to several factors, including insufficient evidence to support their claims, non-compliance with legal and regulatory standards, and a lack of clear communication regarding project details and expectations.
Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to conduct thorough due diligence on Prithvi Developers, considering these legal disputes and unresolved issues before making any purchase decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suo-moto complaint … | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority file… | ["RERA Act violatio… | {"appellant_claim": "The Authority claimed that P… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Prithvi Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1aQiYSygYTinnigp5TH5lRZykc5kqkZlk |
S20-208-0022 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant, Smt. Sunita Mudliar, filed a compl… | ["Discrepancies in … | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Smt. Sunita Mudliar | Prithvi Developers | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2018-00122/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_23db23a0-8fe5-4a05-a23f-796ce3a667ae.pdf |
4-S20-208-0024 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant, Smt. Sumita Basak, filed a complai… | ["Discrepancies in … | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Smt. Sumita Basak | Prithvi Developers | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2018-00123/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_7188ec5a-57ab-4d80-9e05-d65d031a7cc7.pdf |
S20-208-0023 | Chhattisgarh | The applicants, Smt. Nidhi Sao and Shri Ashish Sa… | ["Flat issues", "Pr… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed that … | Shri Ashish Sao | Prithvi Developers | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2018-00121/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_d59c7527-9e5c-4ba4-930f-7334292284e0.pdf |
/..-2023-0868 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant, Ashoka Life Style Colony Residenti… | ["Colony developmen… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Ashoka Life Style C… | Prithvi Developers | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-ALL-2023-01868/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_f6ad9848-5560-44b8-8715-52e94c8ef628.pdf |