PRITHVI HOUSING logo

PRITHVI HOUSING

5.0/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Kerala
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Overview of Prithvi Housing

Prithvi Housing operates in Kerala and has gained attention in the real estate sector due to its involvement in multiple legal cases. With a notable record of winning all the cases adjudicated against it, this builder seems to uphold an image of reliability, despite experiencing a couple of complaints.

Legal Case Details

Summary of Cases

Prithvi Housing has faced two notable complaints:

  1. Villa Project Completion
    Appellant Claim: The complainant alleged that the builder failed to complete the villa project and sought financial relief for the amount already paid.
    Respondent Claim: Prithvi Housing counter-argued that the project was not registrable under RERA (Real Estate Regulation Authority), asserting that the complainant had not adhered to the payment schedule.
    Final Verdict: The authority dismissed the complaint, validating the respondent's claim regarding RERA registration.
  2. Allegations of Cheating
    Appellant Claim: Another complainant accused Prithvi Housing …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Project Completion Disputes Allegations of Fraud and Misappropriation Regulatory Compliance Issues

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Prithvi Housing, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

Several key themes emerged from these disputes, categorized as follows:

  1. Project Completion Disputes: These cases primarily involved claims from complainants stating that the builder failed to complete villa projects as promised. Buyers sought relief for the amounts they paid, suggesting a perceived lack of responsibility on the builder's part. In one instance, the builder successfully argued that the project was not registrable under RERA, to which the authority agreed, dismissing the complaint.
  2. Allegations of Fraud and Misappropriation: In another case, a complainant accused the builder of cheating and misappropriating funds. However, the respondent clarified that they had not engaged in any fraudulent activities and noted that the project was abandoned prior to the RERA Act coming into effect. This defense helped the builder fend off accusations, leading to a …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review