| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, builders are often scrutinized based on their performance, legal history, and customer satisfaction. This blog post explores the reputation and track record of Prithvi Shelter, a builder operating in Maharashtra, based on the legal details provided. With 32 complaints lodged against them and a consistent pattern of losing every case, we delve into the implications of these findings for potential buyers.
Legal Case Overview
Prithvi Shelter has faced 32 complaints, strikingly with 0 cases won and 32 cases lost. This stark statistic suggests a significant and troubling trend in the builder's operational practices, leading to dissatisfaction among clients and legal disputes.
Patterns in Case Losses
The nature of the cases indicates a recurring theme: complaints mainly concern the orders for refunds to complainants. In nearly all instances, the appellant aimed to challenge orders that allowed these refunds, while Prithvi …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Prithvi Shelter, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key takeaways across the board. The cases primarily revolved around three critical topics: refund claims, jurisdictional disputes, and project withdrawal claims.
The majority of the cases were filed by the builder against orders that granted refunds to the complainants. These refund claims often cited reasons such as delays in possession or dissatisfaction with the project's progress. However, the builder consistently argued that the orders permitting refunds were either without jurisdiction or not grounded in legal reality, claiming they were a nullity. This indicates a significant communication gap or procedural misunderstanding between the builder's operations and the legal framework surrounding real estate transactions.
A pattern emerges where common triggers for litigation involve the builder's inability to fulfill promises of timely delivery and the other party's recourse to legal action to obtain refunds. This situation …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!