| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction to Priyadarshini Establishment
Priyadarshini Establishment has made its mark in the property development scene in Madhya Pradesh. Although the builder has faced some litigation, an analysis of their legal cases reveals a noteworthy track record. In this blog post, we will delve into the complaints against Priyadarshini Establishment, explore their legal battles, and provide some insight for potential buyers.
Overview of Legal Cases
Priyadarshini Establishment has been involved in a total of 2 complaints, both of which they have won. This indicates that the builder has effectively managed to defend their interests in legal settings. The cases revolve around claims that the builder failed to complete pending work and failed to hand over a significant balance amount, totaling Rs. 4,20,96,000/- with interest.
Summary of Legal Outcomes
- Case 1:
- Appellant Claim: The applicant asserted that the builder did not finish the agreed-upon work and had not delivered the …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The summaries indicate recurring themes prominently reflected in the disputes, including 'Delayed Payment Claims', 'Pending Work Completion', and 'Disputed Fund Handovers'. These themes emerge from the builder's consistent contestation of claims regarding non-completion of work and failure to transfer funds effectively.
Among these cases, the builder, Priyadarshini Establishment, typically triggered litigation based on disputes over pending work and allegedly owed funds. The cases show that the builder often faced accusations from applicants, claiming that the construction work was not sufficiently completed and that financial transactions regarding substantial amounts (like Rs. 4,20,96,000/-) had not been duly conducted. This reflects a pattern where buyers or other parties suggest that there were inadequacies in the builder's project delivery timelines or the financial dealings involved.
The builder's success in these legal proceedings was frequently attributed …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!