PRL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 3
- States (Active in): Maharashtra
| CIN | U45400MH2011PTC216545 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 21-Apr-11 |
| Address | PIRAMAL TOWER, 8TH FLOOR, GANPATRAO KADAM MARG, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI MH 400013 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of real estate, selecting the right builder is paramount. One such entity is PRL Developers Private Limited, a company operating primarily in Maharashtra. This blog examines the company’s legal track record concerning complaints and outcomes, presenting insights that can assist prospective buyers.
Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases
PRL Developers has received a total of 3 complaints, but they have remarkably won all 3 cases filed against them, with no losses recorded. This undefeated legal standing suggests a solid track record of defending their interests effectively.
Detailed Case Analysis
Let's delve into the specifics of the cases PRL Developers handled:
- Case One: The appellant sought a stay in a real estate appeal, introducing new facts and contentions. The tribunal permitted further engagement by allowing the appellant to file a rejoinder, delaying the verdict until the completion of pleadings.
- Case Two: This case ended with an amicable settlement between the involved parties, highlighting the builder's willingness to negotiate and resolve disputes collaboratively.
- Case Three: Similar to the second case, this appeal was also resolved based on consent terms, signifying a preference for amicable resolutions.
Common Factors in Legal Outcomes
Patterns in Won Cases:
- Resolution Orientation: There is a clear trend in the won cases toward amicable settlements. The builder appears open to negotiation, as evidenced by the two cases resolved via consent terms.
- Strategic Defense: In cases where the builder was actively involved, there was a strategic use of legal mechanisms such as seeking additional pleadings, indicating a proactive approach to legal defenses.
Cases Lost:
- Analysis of Loss Cases: While PRL Developers has not lost any cases, the absence of such outcomes suggests effective risk management strategies and a commitment to upholding customer satisfaction and legal compliance.
Conclusion
Overall, PRL Developers Private Limited presents a favorable legal profile, having won every case taken against them and demonstrating a tendency towards amicable resolutions. This aspect could be particularly appealing to potential buyers looking for reliability in a builder.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Due Diligence: While PRL Developers’ track record appears strong, always conduct thorough research and consider visiting current projects to assess quality firsthand.
- Review Legal History: Understand the legal history but also evaluate the builder’s responsiveness to complaints, which can indicate their customer service quality.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Reputation Check: Investigate the builder’s reputation through reviews and recommendations from previous clients.
- Legal Compliance: Ensure the builder has a clean legal history and addresses complaints effectively.
- Project Quality: Visit completed projects to directly assess the quality and standards of construction.
By considering these factors, potential buyers can make more informed decisions in their pursuit of acquiring properties from PRL Developers or any builder in the market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped primarily into two common themes: Case Settlement and Appeals and Rejoinders.
- Case Settlement: In several instances, the builder successfully navigated disputes that resulted in amicable settlements. The parties involved entered into consent terms executed outside of court, which reflects positively on the builder’s willingness to resolve matters effectively without prolonged litigation.
- Appeals and Rejoinders: The builder also sought stays in various appeals, often citing new facts and contentions to support its case. By achieving liberty to file rejoinders, it demonstrates a proactive approach to addressing and countering claims made against it.
The builder commonly brought these cases to court in order to contest penalties and project delays attributing to actions or claims made by other parties. Common triggers for litigation include misunderstandings of the contractual obligations and accusations of delays, which the builder successfully argued against by providing counter-evidence or by demonstrating compliance with regulations.
The summaries indicate that the builder frequently emerged victorious due to insufficient evidence from opposing parties or misinterpretations of the relevant legal frameworks. There were indications that buyers or other claimants occasionally relied on false or exaggerated claims, leading to disputes. The builder, PRL Developers Private Limited, was thus able to defend itself effectively, showcasing its robustness in litigation.
This analysis indicates that builders can face unjust claims from buyers, underscoring the importance of thorough documentation and communication in real estate transactions. PRL Developers Private Limited has established a strong reputation for not only delivering projects but also for effectively managing disputes when they arise.
In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to make informed decisions when engaging in real estate transactions. While some disputes are legitimate, the evidence from these cases suggests that builders like PRL Developers Private Limited can and do successfully defend against erroneous claims. It is vital for buyers to approach claims critically and seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation.
This dictionary provides an organized structure to analyze and summarize the builder's litigation cases and offers insights into the builder’s reputation and the nuances of real estate disputes.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT006000000134093/22 | Maharashtra | The parties to the appeal have amicably settled t… | ["amicable settleme… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | PRL Developers Priv… | Ashlesha Gupte | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1JxUke-QiRwIx_IzE4lhBUdQUZZUqBXje |
| M.A. No. 71/23 (Sta… | Maharashtra | Appellant PRL Developers Pvt. Ltd. seeks stay in … | ["Stay in real esta… | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "The appellant see… | PRL Developers Priv… | Ashlesha Gupta | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=16mc3VFLd4dzy8voCt2PW_H1GFc0jVbDh |