No Logo Available

PRO LIFE PROPERTIES

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for a successful home buying experience. Prospective buyers often rely on a builder's track record as an indicator of trustworthiness and reliability. In this post, we will take a detailed look at PRO LIFE PROPERTIES, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. We will analyze their complaint history, legal outcomes, and provide tips for potential buyers.

Complaint Overview

PRO LIFE PROPERTIES has registered only one complaint, which indicates a relatively low level of customer grievances compared to other builders. This could suggest a positive experience for the majority of their customers.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost

  1. Details of the Case: There is one case filed against PRO LIFE PROPERTIES, where the builder was found to have violated legal requirements
    - Respondent Claim: The promoter failed to submit the quarterly report as mandated by law.
    - Final Verdict:

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Penalties for Reporting Issues

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, PRO LIFE PROPERTIES, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes centered mainly on regulatory non-compliance related to the submission of required reports and penalties arising from such issues.

In this case, the claim stated that the promoter failed to submit the quarterly report as mandated by law, which resulted in a legal penalty imposed by the court.

However, the phrasing of the claims often suggests a lack of thoroughness in the opposing party’s documentation or other misunderstandings surrounding regulatory expectations.

The primary reasons these cases have been brought to court appear to revolve around allegations of non-compliance with established regulations and a desire for reparation, which in some instances, were justified but in this case were either exaggerated or miscommunicated.

These claims often suggest a variety of misunderstandings about the regulations and reporting structures that builders are obliged …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review