PROGRESSIVE WELFARE SOCIETY logo

PROGRESSIVE WELFARE SOCIETY

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Uttar Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Progressive Welfare Society: Overview and Legal Insights

When considering purchasing property, potential buyers often conduct due diligence on builders to ensure their investments are secure. One such builder, Progressive Welfare Society, has come under scrutiny due to numerous complaints and legal challenges. This blog post aims to provide a detailed overview of the builder's performance, summarizing key legal cases and offering valuable advice for prospective buyers.

Builder Performance Overview

The Progressive Welfare Society has recorded a total of two complaints against it, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. Notably, the builder has not won any cases, raising concerns about their reliability and the potential risk associated with their projects.

States with Projects: Currently, Progressive Welfare Society is noted to operate primarily in Uttar Pradesh, with no additional information provided regarding other states.

Legal Case Details

The legal challenges faced by Progressive Welfare Society include two significant …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Progressive Welfare Society, which it lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, and penalties for project delays.

The first type, delayed possession claims, encompasses the majority of the cases. In these instances, buyers sought possession of their properties, execution of sale deeds, and often requested penalties or interest compensation for the delays attributed to the builder. For example, in one case, the appellant wanted immediate possession and a sale deed, highlighting the frustration buyers face when their home deliveries are postponed.

The second category involves the builder's non-compliance with municipal orders, particularly those issued by the UP RERA (Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority). Under the RERA Act, 2016, builders are required to adhere to certain guidelines to ensure timely project completions. In one significant …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review