No Logo Available

PROMINENT DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the dynamic world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for prospective homeowners. One such entity, Prominent Developers, offers a portfolio of projects primarily in Tamil Nadu. However, before engaging in any contractual obligations, it's essential to examine the builder's track record, as evidenced by their legal dealings. In this blog post, we will analyze the performance of Prominent Developers in the face of customer complaints, focusing on the few cases they have encountered.

Complaints and Legal Cases

Overview of Performance

Prominent Developers has a documented history of two complaints lodged against them. Disturbingly, they lost both cases, indicating potential issues in their construction practices or customer satisfaction levels. This statistic raises questions about their reliability and adherence to project standards.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Lost Cases

In the instances where Prominent Developers faced complaints, both cases highlighted significant allegations against them, centered on:

  • Inadequate Column …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Construction Claims Adequate Column Height Disputes Deviation from Approved Plans Payment Delays and Construction Costs

Analysis of the cases filed against Prominent Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes presented. The cases primarily revolve around four critical issues: delayed construction claims, inadequate column height for foundations, deviations from the approved construction plans, and disputes over payment delays and construction costs.

The first type of cases involves delayed construction claims, where the complainants often cited significant delays in the project completion, which they attributed to the builder's failure to adhere to the timelines. The builder, in defense, typically countered these claims by asserting that the delays were caused by the complainants' failure to provide necessary approvals or to pay the agreed-upon construction costs promptly. This pattern indicates a common trigger for litigation in these cases, which is the perceived delay in project completion and the ensuing blame game between the parties involved.

The second theme emerges from the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review