No Logo Available

PROPEL HOLDINGS LIMITED

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of real estate, constructors are often judged not just by their projects but also by their legal standing and client relations. Propel Holdings Limited is one such builder currently operating within the Tamil Nadu region. With a limited but telling record of complaints and legal cases, it's crucial for prospective buyers to explore the company's track record before making a commitment.

Legal Case Overview

Propel Holdings Limited has faced two notable legal cases, both resulting in a loss for the builder. The primary context of these cases revolved around the execution of sale deeds and the handover of possession of flat No. J-108 in the Casa Grand Asta project. In both instances, the complainants sought the direction to secure their flat ownership, while the builder claimed compliance with necessary regulations, including the completion certificate.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Common Factors in Lost Cases

  • Consistency in …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Failure to Execute Sale Deeds

Analysis of the cases filed against Propel Holdings Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes, particularly surrounding their project Casa Grand Asta. The cases highlight two recurring themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Failure to Execute Sale Deeds.

The majority of the claims made by the complainants revolve around the builder's failure to deliver possession of flats on time, specifically focusing on flat No. J-108. The complainants sought directives for the execution of sale deeds and the handover of possession, which indicates a pattern of dissatisfaction with the builder's fulfillment of contractual obligations.

Common reasons for bringing these cases to court include the builders’ inability to provide timely possession and their failure to honor agreements regarding sale deeds. The builder consistently claimed to have obtained completion certificates and to have handed over possession to other allottees, which suggests an attempt to deflect responsibility and attribute delays …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review