No Logo Available

PROVIDENT HOUSING LIMITED

3.9/5 (125 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Goa, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu
CINU45200KA2008PLC048273
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNo. 130/1 Ulsoor Road Bangalore KA 560042 IN
Company StatusPublic

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction
When considering a property builder, past performance can provide invaluable insights into their reliability and customer service. This blog delves into the legal history of Provident Housing Limited, a builder operating in Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Karnataka. We will explore their track record based on complaints, legal battles won and lost, and what that means for potential buyers.

Overview of the Builder
Provident Housing Limited has faced 125 complaints, of which they won 15 cases and lost 110 cases. This stark ratio raises questions concerning their operational practices, transparency, and customer satisfaction.

Complaints Breakdown

The number of complaints signifies various issues reported by customers, indicating potential areas of concern for future buyers. The main legal issues seem to revolve around contractual agreements and the performance of the projects.

Legal Case Analysis

Patterns in Lost Cases

The analysis of the 110 cases lost reveals …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Refund and Compensation Disputes Amenities and Services Disputes Non-Compliance with RERA and Municipal Orders Misrepresentation and Deception Settlement Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against Provident Housing Limited, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and the common themes emerging from these disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, refund and compensation disputes, amenities and services disputes, non-compliance with RERA and municipal orders, misrepresentation and deception, and settlement disputes.

Delayed possession claims were particularly prevalent, with multiple complainants alleging that the builder failed to deliver possession of their flats within the stipulated time. For instance, in one case, the complainant sought a refund along with interest for a flat in the Provident Skyworth Phase-I project due to the builder's inability to deliver possession on time.

Refunds and compensation also stood as a frequent reason for litigation, often tied to claims of delayed possession or breaches in contractual obligations. Complainants sought refunds based on the failure …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Cancellation of Sale Agreements Construction Payment Plans Compliance Legal Maintainability of Complaints Rejection of Appeals based on Non-compliance

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Provident Housing Limited, in which it lost, reveals several insights about their legal challenges. The predominant themes that filtered through these cases include:

  1. Cancellation of Sale Agreements: A significant number of cases involved the builder contesting the cancellation of registered Agreements for Sale. In these disputes, complainants sought to terminate their agreements with the builder, indicating dissatisfaction with the terms or execution of the project.
  2. Construction Payment Plans Compliance: Another recurring theme was the adherence to construction-linked payment plans. Respondents generally argued that they had fulfilled their payment obligations in accordance with these plans, thereby indicating their stance on the legality of the agreements made.
  3. Legal Maintainability of Complaints: Many of the complaints filed against the builder were dismissed on the basis that they were not legally maintainable before the authority. This raised questions about the effectiveness of …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
False Representation Claims Refund and Compensation Disputes Claims of Project Delays Jurisdictional Issues Settlements and Withdrawals

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped under several recurring themes, including claims of false representations, disputes over refunds and compensation, claims regarding project delays, and jurisdictional issues relevant to the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act (RERA).

  1. False Representation Claims: Numerous complaints emerged where buyers alleged that the builder had misled them about property attributes, such as claims of a sea view. However, the builder consistently denied such claims, successfully defending that no false promises were made.
  2. Refund and Compensation Disputes: Several cases involved complainants seeking refunds or compensation for booking amounts. In many instances, the builders demonstrated that refunds were appropriately handled or that agreements were respected. Many cases were withdrawn after settlements were reached.
  3. Claims of Project Delays: Complaints about project delays were common, often …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review