| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for securing your investment. One such builder in Karnataka is Provident Skyworth Phase 2. In this blog post, we will explore the builder's legal history, the complaints against them, and provide insightful tips for potential homebuyers.
Legal Case Overview
Provident Skyworth Phase 2 has faced a few legal challenges since its inception. Here’s a breakdown of their legal record:
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
Details of Legal Cases
The lone complaint against the builder centered around the developer's failure to complete a project on time. The plaintiff alleged that the builder did not adhere to the promised deadlines and failed to refund the amount as promised.
- Appellant Claim: The plaintiff insisted that the developer’s delays warranted a refund.
- Respondent Claim: In response, the developer contended they would complete the project by late …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Provident Skyworth Phase 2, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, project completion disputes, and issues related to refunds.
The delayed possession claims largely stemmed from the builder's inability to complete the project on time. In the sole case summarized, the plaintiff claimed that the developer had failed to complete the project as promised by the end of 2019 or 2020. This indicates a pattern where builders may overestimate their ability to meet deadlines, leading to significant delays in possession for buyers.
Project completion disputes often overlapped with delayed possession claims, as plaintiffs would frequently argue that the builder's failure to complete the project in a timely manner constituted a breach of contract. The builder's defense typically revolved around their claims of anticipated completion dates, but evidently, this did not meet the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!