No Logo Available

PROVIEW INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Uttar Pradesh
CINU45200DL2008PTC180512
Year EstablishedNot Available
Address220, Opposite Veternity Hospital Village Burari Delhi North Delhi DL 110084 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market, buyers often seek builders who not only deliver quality projects but also maintain a solid reputation. One such builder is Proview Infrastructure Private Limited, operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh. This blog post aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the builder based on available legal data, including complaint history and court outcomes.

Complaint Overview

Proview Infrastructure Private Limited appears to have a relatively minor complaint history, with only 1 complaint filed against them. However, it is critical to delve deeper into this case to assess the implications for potential buyers.

Legal Case Details

The sole case filed against the builder involves delays in possession of a flat. The appellant alleged that Proview failed to deliver the property within the agreed-upon timeframe, seeking a refund along with interest and compensation. In their defense, Proview asserted that the delay was due to unforeseen …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Refund and Compensation Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against Proview Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Refund and Compensation Disputes.

The cases often involve claims from the appellants that Proview Infrastructure failed to deliver possession of their flats within the agreed-upon timelines. This delay frequently triggered requests for refunds of the amounts paid, along with interest and compensation for the distress and financial losses incurred by the appellants. The builder, on the other hand, typically defended itself by attributing the delays to unforeseen circumstances beyond its control. However, the appellate tribunal consistently sided with the appellants, indicating a degree of disfavor towards the builder's defense strategy.

A common reason for the litigation in these cases was the builder's inability to meet project timelines and fulfill its contractual obligations. The appellants often …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review