No Logo Available

PRT CONSTRUCTION

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Chhattisgarh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Understanding PRT Construction: A Detailed Analysis of Performance and Customer Feedback

When considering a builder for your next project or investment, it’s crucial to review their track record and client feedback. In this blog post, we’ll take a closer look at PRT Construction, examining their legal history, complaints, case outcomes, and offering recommendations for potential clients based on the available data.

Builder Overview

PRT Construction is a builder that has worked predominantly in the state of Chhattisgarh. Despite having only one recorded complaint, it's important to evaluate their performance thoroughly to understand what potential clients might face.

Legal Case Details and Patterns

Cases Lost

In the provided data, PRT Construction has faced one legal case where they did not achieve a favorable outcome. The details of the case are as follows:

  • Appellant Claim: The applicant accused PRT Construction of delaying the possession of a flat and was seeking …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Contractual Disputes Financial Disputes Penalties for Excess Payments

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The examples presented highlight various themes in the disputes, with a notable emphasis on 'Delayed Possession Claims' and 'Contractual Disputes.' The primary issues appear to revolve around claims regarding delays in handover, disagreements typically associated with contractual obligations, and financial disputes regarding payments made by the applicants.

The disputes primarily stemmed from applicants alleging that possession of their flats was unjustly delayed, resulting in requests for refunds of excess payments. In the specific case mentioned, the builder successfully defended against claims that included not only delays but also complex contractual matters where applicants allegedly executed multiple contracts for the same flat without fulfilling their financial obligations fully. This indicates that a significant number of cases were motivated by financial discrepancies rather than outright mismanagement by the builder.

The builder's successes in these cases …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review