PRUDENT INFRAREALTY PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market, choosing the right builder is crucial for prospective homeowners. One such builder is Prudent Infrarealty Private Limited, known for their developments in West Bengal. However, a closer examination of their legal history reveals some notable challenges. This article analyzes the builder's complaint record and court outcomes to provide potential buyers with essential insights before making a decision.

Legal Case Overview

Prudent Infrarealty Private Limited has recorded a total of 2 complaints against them. Out of these, they have lost both cases, indicating potential concerns about their business practices or compliance with regulations. Here’s a breakdown of the cases:

1. Case 1: Complaint Against Prana Welfare Committee
   • Appellant Claim: There was a complaint against the builder for unknown reasons.
   • Respondent Claim: The Prana Welfare Committee was not a registered entity.
   • Final Verdict: The complaint was rejected as the Prana Welfare Committee was not registered.
2. Case …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Prudent Infrarealty Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory compliance disputes and issues surrounding the formation of associations and the rights of allottees.

In terms of regulatory compliance, many of the claims made by the complainants allege that the builder failed to adhere to certain regulations. This highlights an ongoing concern in the real estate sector where builders often find themselves at odds with regulatory requirements. Common reasons for these disputes include the builder’s inability to provide adequate documentation or evidence of their compliance efforts, as seen in the case where the builder was directed to submit hard copies of judgments.

The formation of associations of allottees is another significant theme in these cases. The Authority's decision to direct the builder to apply for the formation of such an association …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Prudent Infrarealty Private Limited, which it lost reveals several important insights into the nature of its disputes and the recurring themes in its legal challenges. The cases primarily fall into three categories: 'Disputes over Association Validity', 'Regulatory Compliance Issues', and 'Disputes on Legal Status of Entities'.

In the first category, disputes often center on the legal standing of entities involved, as seen in the case against the Prana Welfare Committee. Here, the builder questioned the legitimacy of the committee, but the lack of registration resulted in the rejection of the complaint. This suggests that issues concerning the validation of associations or committees can trigger litigation, particularly if the builder perceives them as obstructive to their business operations or projects.

Common reasons driving the builder to court appear to include contesting judgments that impact their business, such …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis