CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the world of real estate, selecting the right builder is paramount for a hassle-free experience. Today, we will focus on PS Group Realty Private Limited, a builder with operations primarily based in West Bengal. Through an analysis of the builder's legal track record, we aim to provide potential buyers with a comprehensive understanding of what to expect.
Overview of Legal Complaints
PS Group Realty has received a total of 4 formal complaints. Out of these, the builder has won 2 cases and lost 2. This offers a mixed view of the builder's ability to manage disputes effectively.
In-Depth Analysis of Legal Cases
Cases Lost: Context and Patterns
The builder lost a notable case where the appellant argued for an extension due to delays caused by the pandemic and supply issues. The builder had initially contended that they were acting in the interest of the allottees by granting an extension …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against PS Group Realty Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised. The cases can be broadly categorized into common disputes, highlighting the builder's recurring challenges.
Many of the cases revolve around Delayed Possession Claims, where buyers likely contested the builder's inability to deliver properties on time. This is a familiar theme in real estate disputes, often attributed to various factors such as mismanagement, unforeseen circumstances, or inadequate planning. The builder's defense in these cases was not provided, but it is critical to note that delays in possession are a major concern for homebuyers who expect timely fulfillment of their investments.
Many cases also involve Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, suggesting that the builder faced regulatory challenges that led to legal action. This could encompass everything from building code violations to failure to secure necessary permits. The builder's …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by PS Group Realty Private Limited which it lost reveals a few recurring themes. The disputes largely revolve around 'Delayed Possession Claims' and 'Extension Requests Due to Special Circumstances'. In instances where projects encountered delays, the builder often sought extensions based on reasons like the pandemic or shortages in construction materials, arguing that these unforeseen circumstances warranted additional time to fulfill their contractual obligations.
However, the summary reveals that these requests to extend project timelines were not simply about seeking additional time; they often stemmed from deeper issues. The builder frequently brought these cases to court to contest penalties levied for project delays and to challenge the decisions made by governing bodies regarding their compliance with regulatory requirements. Underlying these disputes is a pattern where the builder disputes responsibility for delays, pointing to external factors that hindered progress.
Despite these assertions, the builder lost these …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, PS Group Realty Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes predominantly revolve around two major themes: 'Delayed Possession Claims' and 'Project Completion Extensions'. These themes encapsulate the primary issues that the builder faced when navigating legal challenges, particularly those arising from delays attributable to external factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic and issues related to construction resources.
In the 'Delayed Possession Claims' category, the builder frequently sought extensions based on challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic and unexpected shortages in labor and materials. In both instances, the builder demonstrated that the causes of these delays were largely beyond their control, resulting in a call for necessary relief from penalties associated with late project completion. Additionally, all claims by the builder showed a clear effort to adhere to regulatory requirements and communicate effectively with governing bodies prior …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!