| CIN | U45200MP2011PTC025697 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | 206-207, 3rd Floor Navneet Darshan Greatar kailash, 16/2 Old Palasia , Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India - 452001 |
| Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder can make or break your home buying experience. Today, we are focusing on PSJS Housing Private Limited, a builder operating in Madhya Pradesh. With limited data available, we will analyze their performance through the lens of legal cases and complaints to provide potential buyers with a clear perspective.
Overview of PSJS Housing Private Limited
PSJS Housing Private Limited is involved in the development of residential properties in Madhya Pradesh. Despite having a presence in the state, the company has faced legal challenges that potential buyers should consider. As per the available data, the builder has one complaint registered against them, resulting in a lost case.
Legal Case Insights
Cases Overview
- Complaints Against the Builder: PSJS Housing has one documented complaint.
- Legal Outcomes: The builder lost this case, which highlights potential issues in fulfilling their contractual obligations.
Specific …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against PSJS Housing Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, highlighting significant disputes between the builder and buyers regarding the delivery of units and the execution of sale deeds.
One of the most common reasons for litigation involved the builder's failure to provide possession of flats despite receiving full payment from buyers. This points to a troubling trend where buyers are left in limbo, unable to move into their new homes or recoup their investments. The builder's defense often centered around claims that projects were incomplete or that buyers were not entitled to possession, which indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of contractual obligations and timelines.
The verdicts consistently favored the buyers, with authorities mandating compensation, including refunds of payment along with interest, and damages for mental distress and other incurred expenses. This underscores …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!