No Logo Available

PTC BUILDERS

3.8/5 (12 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Kerala
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

When considering purchasing property, the reputation of the builder is paramount. A study of PTC Builders reveals a concerning track record that prospective homebuyers should scrutinize. This blog delves into the builder's case history, complaint statistics, and provides buyer tips.

Overview of PTC Builders

PTC Builders, primarily active in Kerala, has amassed a total of 12 complaints against them. Alarmingly, they have lost all 12 cases, posing serious questions about their reliability and trustworthiness.

Legal Case Details

An evaluation of the legal cases filed against PTC Builders uncovers several recurring themes and patterns indicating a significant level of dissatisfaction among clients:

Common Patterns in Lost Cases:

  1. Delayed Construction: A predominant issue across the cases is the late completion of apartment units. Many complainants reported that their properties were not completed in a timely manner, leading them to seek refunds of the amounts they had paid.
  2. Unfulfilled Possession Promises

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Failure to Provide Promised Amenities Project Completion Disputes Penalties for Project Delays Refund and Compensation Claims

Analysis of the cases filed against PTC Builders, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and the common themes emerging from these legal disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, failures to provide promised amenities, project completion disputes, penalties for delays, and refund/compensation claims. Many of the complaints were centered around the builder's inability to complete projects on time, which led to multiple claims for delayed possession. Complainants often cited that they had made full payments for their apartments yet faced prolonged waiting periods without any resolution.

A recurring pattern in these cases was the builder's defense, which frequently attributed delays to circumstances beyond their control, such as force majeure situations, or to actions taken by the complainants, like delayed payment of installments. However, the legal authorities did not accept these defenses in many instances, leading to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review