CIN | U70101DL2005PTC141373 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 8-D, Hansalaya-15 Barakhamba Road NA NEW DELHI Central Delhi DL 110001 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding Puma Realtors Private Limited
Puma Realtors Private Limited operates primarily in Punjab and has experienced a rather tumultuous relationship with its customers, reflected in the significant number of complaints registered against it. In this blog post, we will analyze the builder’s legal history, focusing on the outcomes of the complaints filed against them and their performance in court.
Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases
Puma Realtors has recorded a total of 29 complaints against it. Out of these, the builder has won 7 cases and lost 22 cases, a stark indication that customers have often felt compelled to seek legal recourse. The discrepancy between the number of cases won and lost raises questions about the builder's business practices and their adherence to regulations.
Dive into Legal Cases
Cases Won by Puma Realtors
Puma Realtors filed for and won 1 case. This case revealed that the appeals were …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Puma Realtors Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the board. The primary theme observed in these cases is the frequent withdrawal of complaints by the complainants, all of whom sought liberty to file fresh complaints at a later stage. This leads to a broader implication that many disputes in this context may not reach a conclusive verdict, instead allowing room for reevaluation and potential re-filing.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court in this scenario primarily revolve around the complainants' desire to withdraw their existing complaints. The pattern that emerges from the summaries indicates that the builder was not actively involved in the withdrawal process, signaling a potential lack of proactive engagement with customer grievances. The liberty to file fresh complaints, as granted by the court's dismissal of the existing ones, suggests that the complainants may have felt their …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Puma Realtors Private Limited, which it won, revealed several interesting insights into the builder's legal landscape and areas of common contention. These cases can be broadly grouped into three recurring themes, namely 'Disputes Related to Project Delays', 'Land Classification and Disputes', and 'Regulatory Compliance Issues'. Each of these themes reflects the prevalent challenges encountered in the real estate sector, opening discussions on the reasons behind these disputes and the outcomes that followed.
In the realm of 'Disputes Related to Project Delays', it seems that the builder often contended with external factors deemed responsible for project hold-ups. The construction industry is notorious for encountering delays, whether due to bureaucratic red tape or unforeseen circumstances. This theme illustrates the builder's proactive stance in defending its timeline commitments by attributing delays to opposing parties.
Moving to 'Land Classification and Disputes' …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The complaints lodged against Puma Realtors Private Limited exhibit a variety of themes, primarily revolving around withdrawals of complaints, compliance with regulatory requirements, disputes over additional payment demands, and issues regarding project registration.
Firstly, several cases involved claimants seeking to withdraw their complaints or to re-file them under different circumstances. This indicates a certain level of conflict resolution or dissatisfaction with the initial claims. Secondly, disputes arose over whether the builder was complying with the stipulations of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Several complaints were made against additional demands for funds, which the opposing parties claimed were in contravention of the relevant sections of the regulations. Additionally, issues of project registration surfaced, with claimants asserting that the builder was not registered with the authority, only for the builder to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!