| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
Purchasing a property is a significant investment, and prospective homeowners often look for builders with a strong track record. In this blog post, we delve into Puneet Developers, a builder operating mainly in Maharashtra, to examine their legal history and performance in various cases.
Overview of Legal Cases
Puneet Developers has faced a total of one legal complaint. In all instances of legal scrutiny, the builder has successfully won one case, while another case resulted in a loss. The details of these legal proceedings provide valuable insights into the builder's operational integrity and challenges they may face.
Breakdown of Legal Cases
- Case Won: Puneet Developers had a favorable outcome in one legal instance, showcasing their ability to effectively navigate legal challenges.
- Case Lost: In the single case they lost, the appellant claimed that an order from a Single Member Bench of the Tribunal was enforceable. In contrast, Puneet Developers …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Puneet Developers, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily hinged on jurisdictional issues regarding tribunal orders and the enforceability of said orders.
Buyers expressed claims around the enforcement of orders from a Single Member Bench of the Tribunal, suggesting that such orders were enforceable, while the builder countered that these orders were issued without jurisdiction, therefore deemed void ab initio. As a result, the execution of these applications was dismissed by the courts, validating the builder's stance.
The cases brought against Puneet Developers typically revolved around claims for execution of tribunal orders, often stemming from a misunderstanding or disagreement over the legal validity of those orders. Buyers sought to hold the builder accountable to what they perceived as enforceable orders, while the builder defended itself by establishing that these orders were legally unfounded and lacked jurisdiction. This …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!