No Logo Available

PUNIT ENTERPRISE

3.8/5 (4 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Punit Enterprise is a builder that operates primarily in Gujarat. While the prospect of purchasing a new home is exciting, prospective buyers need to be aware of the legal standing and reputation of builders before making significant financial commitments. This blog post looks into the legal cases involving Punit Enterprise, analyzing their performance in these disputes and providing valuable insights for potential buyers.

Complaints and Legal Standing

Punit Enterprise has faced 4 complaints, with a record of losing all cases lodged against them, leading to a win-loss ratio of 0:4. This is a concerning statistic for anyone considering investing in properties built by this firm.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost by Punit Enterprise
Common Factors:
  • Prosecution under RERA Act:
    • In both instances where Punit Enterprise lost, the primary violation was related to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). The builder claimed ignorance of the law or failed …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with RERA Act and Rules Project Completion and Occupancy Certificate Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against Punit Enterprise, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the appellants. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: non-compliance with the RERA Act and Rules, and project completion and occupancy certificate disputes.

The primary reason for the filings in these cases was the builder's failure to submit quarterly reports as mandated by the RERA Act and Rules. The appellants claimed that the lack of these reports violated regulatory requirements, while the builder responded consistently across cases that their projects were completed on time and that occupancy certificates had been obtained. This indicates a pattern where the builder may have been disputing the necessity for ongoing reporting once a project was completed, highlighting a potential misunderstanding of their obligations under the RERA framework.

The verdicts in both cases reflect a common outcome: the authority determined that …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-Compliance Penalties for Project Delays Disputes over Documentation Failure to Register Projects

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Punit Enterprise, which it lost, reveals significant insights into the nature of its disputes and the recurring themes surrounding its legal challenges.

Firstly, we observe that a primary theme of these cases pertains to Regulatory Non-Compliance. In one instance, the authority rightfully imposed a penalty because Punit Enterprise had sold a flat without the necessary registration mandated by the RERA Act. This theme underscores a critical area where the builder has repeatedly faltered, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to regulatory frameworks to prevent such legal repercussions.

Another notable theme is the Penalties for Project Delays. While the summaries do not explicitly detail cases of delayed possession, the underlying issues often stem from the builder's failure to meet timely submissions and audits, which ultimately reflect on project management practices and compliance directives.

Additionally, we find a significant number of …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review