
CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering a builder for your property investment, it’s crucial to evaluate their legal track record. In this post, we will explore the legal history of Punjab and Sind Bank based on the number of complaints filed against them, their success rate in legal battles, and insights that can aid potential buyers.
Legal Overview
Punjab and Sind Bank has faced a total of 8 complaints. They have emerged victorious in 2 cases, while they lost 6 cases across various states, primarily in Haryana and Punjab. Understanding the details of these cases can shed light on possible areas of concern for prospective buyers.
Cases Lost by Punjab and Sind Bank
Of the 6 cases lost by Punjab and Sind Bank, 3 involved claims where the appellant asserted that the property should be free from liabilities and encumbrances, a claim that the bank contested. The final verdict clarified that all responsibilities …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder which it lost revealed several key points across the complaints raised. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: Withdrawal of Complaints, Insufficient Information, and Statistical Dismissal.
The majority of the cases fell under the category of Withdrawal of Complaints. In these instances, the complainants requested to withdraw their complaints without citing specific reasons or grievances against the builder. This could suggest a number of scenarios, such as resolutions being reached outside of the courtroom, lack of substantial claims to begin with, or possibly even intimidation or negotiation tactics employed by the builder. The frequent withdrawal of complaints indicates a pattern where disputes may not necessarily reach a conclusive verdict, leaving the builder's operational integrity somewhat questioned.
Another notable category was Insufficient Information. Here, the claims made by both the appellants and the respondents were …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Punjab and Sind Bank, which it lost, reveals significant insights into the nature of the disputes faced and the recurring themes that characterize these legal challenges.
The primary theme that surfaces from the summaries is centered around issues of property liability and encumbrances. In multiple instances, the builder argued that properties should be considered free from any liabilities or encumbrances based on interpretations of regulatory authority communications, specifically referencing observations made in a particular paragraph (para 11). However, the consistent rebuttal from the responding parties has highlighted that these observations do not absolve them of responsibility for existing liabilities.
Another key theme is the regulatory compliance aspect. The cases indicate that despite the builder's claims regarding properties being liability-free, the defenses raised emphasize ongoing responsibilities and liabilities that cannot be dismissed. This indicates a troubling pattern where the builder’s …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Punjab and Sind Bank, which the builder won, revealed the following information:
- Delayed Possession Claims: A recurring theme across the complaints was the claim by buyers that they had made substantial payments but had yet to receive possession of their properties. In the examined cases, the complainants argued that despite paying a significant sum of Rs. 20,50,000/- each, the builder failed to hand over the possession of flats. However, it is crucial to notice that the builder justified their stance by stating that the possession was contingent upon the payment of the remaining balance amounts, thus indicating that unfinished financial obligations can be a cause for possession delays.
- Disputes over Payment: The builder's defense often centered around allegations that buyers had not fulfilled their financial commitments. In the instances analyzed, the builder successfully argued that the complainants had outstanding balance amounts …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!