No Logo Available

PUNJAB POLICE PRIMARY CONSUMER'S CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED

3.8/5 (12 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Punjab
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the real estate market, the trustworthiness of builders plays a crucial role in the decision-making process for potential homebuyers. Today, we delve into the notable case of the Punjab Police Primary Consumer's Co-operative Society Limited, a builder that has faced significant legal challenges, resulting in a troubling record of case losses. In this blog post, we will analyze the builder's legal history, identify patterns in their complaints, and offer vital tips for prospective buyers considering this builder.

Legal Case Overview

The Punjab Police Primary Consumer's Co-operative Society Limited has encountered a total of 12 complaints, all of which culminated in losses, with no wins reported. This alarming statistic raises red flags, indicating potential issues regarding the builder's operations and customer satisfaction.

Analysis of the Legal Cases

Common Factors in Lost Cases

Upon reviewing the details of the cases, several common threads emerge:

  1. Delay in Project Completion

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Jurisdictional Disputes Over Refunds and Interest Delays Attributed to Unforeseen Circumstances Compensation for Mental Agony and Harassment

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Punjab Police Primary Consumer's Co-operative Society Limited, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases can be broadly categorized into four topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Jurisdictional Disputes Over Refunds and Interest, Delays Attributed to Unforeseen Circumstances, and Compensation for Mental Agony and Harassment.

The majority of the cases revolved around Delayed Possession Claims, where the complainants alleged that they had paid for residential plots yet faced a delay of over 7 years in possession delivery. The builder consistently attributed these delays to circumstances beyond their control, such as amendments in regulatory frameworks and requirements for land ownership. However, the Adjudicating Officer typically found fault with the builder for failing to complete projects on time, leading to entitlements for compensation due to mental agony and harassment.

Jurisdictional Disputes …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review