PURAVANKARA LIMITED

Introduction

PURAVANKARA LIMITED is a prominent name in the real estate sector, operating primarily in the states of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka. With a notable history in construction and development, this builder has encountered both triumphs and challenges in their legal journey, as reflected in the complaints filed against them.

Legal Case Overview

In total, PURAVANKARA LIMITED has faced 66 complaints, with the outcomes revealing a mixed record of 24 cases won and 42 lost. This blog delves into the patterns observed in the cases to provide prospective buyers insights into the builder's reputation and dealings.

Patterns in Lost Cases

The 42 lost cases against PURAVANKARA LIMITED reveal a few common factors:

1. Timeliness of Deliveries: Many complainants have raised issues regarding delays in possession and the completion of projects within stipulated timelines. In several instances, the authority found deficiencies in timely possession.
2. Project Execution and Amenities: There were complaints …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Puravankara Limited, which it lost, revealed a multitude of themes across various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into types that reflect the common grievances of the complainants.

Delayed Possession Claims

Many cases centered around the builder's failure to deliver possession of flats within the stipulated timeline. Complainants often sought compensation for these delays, which led to a series of legal battles. The outcomes generally favored the complainants, highlighting systemic issues within the builder's project management capabilities.

Refund and Compensation Disputes

Many complainants sought refunds due to delays, non-fulfillment of promises regarding amenities, and other grievances. The builder's inability to meet the expectations created during the sale process resulted in legal actions where the complainants sought to recover their investments along with interest. The verdicts typically mandated refunds or compensation, indicating a lack of accountability on the builder’s part.

Non-Compliance …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder PURAVANKARA LIMITED that it lost revealed insightful patterns regarding their disputes in the real estate sector. The cases can be grouped into a few recurring themes that highlight the builder's primary conflicts.

1. Delayed Possession Claims: In one notable case, the builder was challenged due to claimed delays in executing contractual obligations like the registration of a rectification deed. The complainant requested interest for the delay, indicating the builder's failure to uphold timely delivery and proper documentation as per agreed terms.
2. Contractual Non-compliance: This theme encompasses disputes where the builder was accused of not adhering to specific contractual agreements, particularly regarding finishing works and property specifications. These disputes often led to questions about whether all terms were met satisfactorily before possession was granted.
3. Disputes over Area Specifications: A common area of contention has been regarding …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, PURAVANKARA LIMITED, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder's primary disputes can be grouped into several key themes: Delayed Payment Claims, Possession and Compensation Disputes, Refunds and Information Disclosure Issues, and Regulatory Disputes. These categories represent the main issues that led to legal actions involving this builder.

In the realm of Delayed Payment Claims, complaints typically arose when buyers alleged that interest was not paid on delayed amounts. PURAVANKARA LIMITED often defended itself successfully by showcasing that payments made, while at times delayed from the buyer's side, did not warrant additional interest claims due to their own compliance with prior agreements.

Possession and Compensation Disputes highlight instances where buyers sought compensation for delays in receiving their properties. In many of these cases, the builder contended that possession was delivered on time, effectively countering …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, PURAVANKARA LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed several important themes and insights into the disputes that arose in the real estate context.

1. Withdrawal of Complaints

Several cases involved complaints that were voluntarily withdrawn by the plaintiffs. Disputes over refunds and project expectations often saw amicable resolutions where both parties agreed to drop the claims, indicating that at times contention may arise from misunderstandings or changing circumstances.

2. Non-Compliance and Objections

There were cases where plaintiffs claimed violations of obligations, such as those under the RERA Act. However, the builder was able to demonstrate fulfillment of their commitments, emphasizing that complaints often stem from a lack of awareness regarding legal obligations.

3. Delayed Possession Claims

Some complaints centered around the non-timely handover of properties. However, in these instances, the builder successfully argued that they met deadlines and properly informed complainants …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis