| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the Indian real estate sector, the reputation of a builder plays a critical role in the decision-making process of potential homebuyers. Today, we delve into Puravankara Projects Limited, a notable builder operating in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. This analysis will evaluate the builder's legal history, drawing insights from their past complaints and resolutions to provide a clear picture for prospective buyers.
Overview of Legal Cases
Puravankara Projects Limited has faced a total of 46 complaints, resulting in 1 case won and a staggering 45 cases lost. This substantial number of legal disputes raises questions about the builder’s operational practices and customer satisfaction.
Patterns in Lost Cases
A detailed review of the cases in which Puravankara Projects Limited lost reveals several common factors:
- Compliance Issues: A significant number of cases stemmed from non-compliance with the directions of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA). The majority of …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Puravankara Projects Limited, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and compliance with regulatory requirements. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes, highlighting the primary disputes faced by the builder.
The first theme revolves around Delayed Possession Claims. In one notable case, the plaintiff sought compensation for the delay in the delivery of their flat. The builder attributed the lag to technical issues; however, the RERA ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering compensation of Rs. 10,000. This pattern indicates a common concern among buyers regarding the builder's ability to adhere to timelines.
Discriminatory Practices emerged as another theme. A complainant alleged that they were allotted a covered car parking in a different block from their apartment, which they considered discriminatory. The authority agreed, directing the builder to provide parking in the same block as the apartment. …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Puravankara Projects Limited, which it lost, reveals several key issues and recurring themes that encapsulate the nature of its legal disputes. The primary contention revolves around the imposition of penalties by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA) due to the builder's failure to register its projects according to mandated regulations. This commonality suggests a systemic issue in complying with the registration process as outlined by the regulatory authority.
The cases can be grouped into a few distinct categories based on overarching themes. Firstly, there are significant instances of 'Regulatory Non-compliance', where the builder faced penalties for not following the directives set by the TNRERA, leading to multiple legal challenges. In nearly all instances, the builder contested the penalties, claiming them to be unjust. This highlights a consistent theme of 'Penalties for Project Delays', reflecting the outcomes of their failure to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Puravankara Projects Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around compliance with directions relating to amenities, specifically the allotment of car parks. In one notable case, the Execution Petitioner claimed that the Promoter had not complied with the directions regarding car park allotment, while the Promoter defended that they had, in fact, fulfilled such directions. The final verdict confirmed the Promoter's compliance, indicating that the builders had adhered to all requirements laid out by the authorities.
The reasons behind these disputes largely stemmed from disagreements over whether the builder fulfilled their obligations as outlined in agreements or directives from government bodies. Commonly, buyers or executing parties questioned the adherence to specific conditions tied to additional amenities, which reveals a trend of misunderstandings or miscommunications regarding expectations.
Puravankara Projects Limited effectively won these cases largely due …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!