No Logo Available

PURISONS ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Haryana
CINU29192DL1981PTC012606
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressC-4, PAMPOSH ENCLAVE, KALKAJI , NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110048
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount for a smooth home-buying experience. Purisons Engineers Private Limited has established a presence in the industry with its projects primarily located in Haryana. In this blog post, we will explore the builder's performance based on legal case data and offers insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Purisons Engineers Private Limited

Purisons Engineers Private Limited currently has one recorded complaint against them, which indicates a relatively low level of contention in customer relations. Notably, the builder has been successful in winning the sole legal case filed against them, demonstrating effective handling of disputes.

Legal Case Details

Cases Overview

Purisons Engineers Private Limited has faced only one legal challenge, where the complaint revolved around:

  • Appellant Claim: The complainant reported a delay in possession of a flat and accused the builder of unfair trade practices by charging advance maintenance …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Disputes Over Maintenance and Club Charges

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Purisons Engineers Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder's legal endeavors primarily revolved around two key topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Disputes Over Maintenance and Club Charges. These themes represent recurring types of disputes that can significantly impact both builders and buyers in the real estate sector.

  1. Delayed Possession Claims: In instances where buyers claimed delayed possession of flats, the builder was often able to demonstrate that possession was, in fact, provided within the agreed-upon time frame. The builder strategically countered these claims by validating the timeline outlined in purchase agreements, thereby illustrating that delays, if any, were minimal or unjustified.
  2. Disputes Over Maintenance and Club Charges: There were instances where the builder was accused of unfair trade practices, particularly in relation to charging advance maintenance and club charges without proper justification. Through these disputes, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review