| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the world of real estate, the quality of a builder can significantly impact the homeowner's experience. Today, we delve into the performance of Puru Colonizers Private Limited, a builder based in Punjab, that has recently come under scrutiny due to numerous legal challenges. With our analysis, we aim to inform potential buyers about the implications of choosing a builder with a checkered legal history.
Builder Overview
Puru Colonizers Private Limited has become a subject of concern, especially given the 8 complaints lodged against them, all of which have resulted in losses for the company. This reflects a concerning trend in the builder's ability to deliver on promises and satisfactorily complete projects.Legal Case Details
The cases against Puru Colonizers primarily revolve around the incomplete project titled 'Nabha Enclave'. Complainants have consistently claimed that the builder failed to provide essential facilities, such as:- Drainage
- Sewerage
- Electricity
- Roads
- …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Puru Colonizers Private Limited, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and the grievances of the complainants. The cases primarily revolved around three key themes: delayed possession claims, inadequate provision of basic facilities, and unfair trade practices.
The majority of the claims were centered around the delayed completion of the project 'Nabha Enclave.' Complainants repeatedly highlighted the lack of basic amenities such as drainage, sewerage, electricity, roads, and water supply, which are fundamental for any residential community. This indicates a systemic issue where the builder may have prioritized profit over the welfare and expectations of buyers, leading to multiple litigation cases.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court included contesting the builder's claims of completed projects, disputing the adequacy of facilities provided, and alleging unfair practices related to withholding information or misrepresenting the status of projects. A consistent pattern emerged …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!