No Logo Available

PURVA WESTEND

3.8/5 (6 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market, understanding the performance of builders is crucial for potential homeowners. In this post, we will delve into the details surrounding Purva Westend, a builder currently operating primarily in Karnataka. With a record of complaints and legal cases that demand attention, it is important for prospective buyers to be informed.

Legal Case History

Purva Westend has faced 6 total complaints with a rather concerning outcome: the builder has lost all 6 cases filed against it, indicating a pattern that potential buyers should consider. Here, we break down the specifics of the cases.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases Lost

While details about the specific claims made against Purva Westend are limited, the fact that the builder lost every case filed against them raises red flags. The outcomes indicate a lack of legal success, which may suggest issues such as:

  • Inadequate Communication: Many disputes …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Compensation Disputes Settlement Amount Claims

Analysis of the cases filed against Purva Westend, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around three common topics: delayed possession claims, compensation disputes, and settlement amount claims.

Many of the complaints made by the homeowners involved delayed possession of their properties. For instance, in one case, the complainant claimed that the developer had delayed the handover of the property by more than six months and sought compensation for this inconvenience. This highlights a significant area of concern for buyers who expect timely possession of their investments.

Compensation disputes emerged as another major theme. In the aforementioned case, the builder contested the delay claim and instead sought to penalize the complainant for not taking possession within a two-month timeframe after the occupancy certificate was issued. This shows a pattern where builders often counter claims with their own assertions of non-compliance by homeowners, leading …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review