No Logo Available

PURVA WESTEND PHASE 1

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder can be a daunting task. For prospective buyers considering Purva Westend Phase 1 in Karnataka, there are essential insights to be gleaned from the builder's legal history. In this article, we delve into the complaints against the builder, their legal outcomes, and what this means for future home buyers.

Builder Overview

Builder Name: Purva Westend Phase 1
Number of Complaints: 2
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 2
States with Projects: Karnataka

Legal Case Details

Purva Westend Phase 1 has encountered two significant legal challenges, both of which have ended unfavorably for the developer. Below is a summary of the cases:

  1. Case Overview: The plaintiffs in both cases claimed that there were delays in the possession of their flats, for which they sought compensation.
    - Respondent's Defense: The builder attributed these delays to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Compensation Disputes Unforeseen Circumstances Defense

Analysis of the cases filed against Purva Westend Phase 1, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, with multiple plaintiffs seeking compensation for the developer's failure to deliver properties on time.

The builder consistently defended these claims by attributing the delays to unforeseen circumstances. However, the authority did not accept this defense and ultimately ordered the builder to pay compensation of ₹50,000 in each case, alongside a commitment to expedite possession by December 2018.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: plaintiffs commonly contested the builder's project timelines and sought redress for the emotional and financial strain caused by these delays. The builder's repeated reliance on the unforeseen circumstances defense suggests a systemic issue that may indicate inadequate project management or risk assessment practices.

The reason the builder lost these cases likely stems from their inability to provide sufficient …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review