| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the real estate market, trustworthiness and accountability are paramount for establishing lasting relationships between builders and homebuyers. Purvankar Limited, a builder based in Karnataka, provides a vital case study in scrutinizing a builder's reliability through their legal track record. This blog explores the builder's performance in legal disputes, examining the cases they have faced, along with critical insights for prospective buyers.
Legal Performance of Purvankar Limited
Overview of Complaints and Legal Outcomes
Purvankar Limited has faced a total of three legal complaints, all of which were decided in their favor. The builder has successfully won all three cases, demonstrating an ability to defend their actions and decisions effectively.
Summary of Legal Cases
The cases filed against Purvankar Limited share a notable common factor:
- Modification Without Consent: In each case, complainants alleged that Purvankar Limited made unauthorized modifications to their apartments. They sought significant compensation of Rs. 22,75,000/- under …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Purvankar Limited, which the builder won, revealed several key insights into the nature of disputes involving this developer. Notably, the recurring theme of modification disputes emerged as complainants raised claims regarding unauthorized alterations made to their apartments. Additionally, there were significant claims centered around violations of consent and demands for compensation, with the common figure being Rs. 22,75,000/- sought by the opposing parties.
The primary reason these cases were brought to court was the dissatisfaction of buyers who felt that modifications were made without their direct approval, leading them to seek financial restitution. These cases often stemmed from misunderstandings or miscommunications regarding the scope of modifications that could be made to the properties. It's evident from the case summaries that buyers sometimes expected a level of control over modifications that was not upheld in the contracts or agreements they had in …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!