| CIN | U45201UP1987PTC008971 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | IInd FLOOR PUSHPANJALI PALACE DELHI GATE AGRA UP 282002 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to choosing a builder for your construction project, it’s essential to review their track record and reputation. Today, we delve into PUSHPANJALI CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, a builder operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh. This analysis will provide potential buyers with insights into the builder's reliability based on legal disputes and overall performance.
Overview of PUSHPANJALI CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
PUSHPANJALI CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED has been involved in only one legal complaint to date, and the builder has not won any cases. This situation might raise a red flag for potential buyers. Examining the case details will help us better understand the implications of this track record.
Legal Case Details
The builder’s sole legal case involved an appellant who claimed that an issue had been settled through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 05.07.2022. Interestingly, the respondent (PUSHPANJALI CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED) did not present any claims in response to …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder PUSHPANJALI CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, which it lost, revealed insightful information about the nature of disputes the builder faced. The primary theme that emerged from this analysis was 'Settlement Disputes,' highlighted by the case where the builder claimed that an issue had been settled through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). This illustrates the importance placed on settlements in the construction sector, particularly regarding interpretations of agreements made between parties.
In the case at hand, the builder contended that their claims had been resolved with the other party via an MOU dated 05.07.2022. However, despite this assertion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not pressed, which suggests that the claims may not have been as robust as the builder had believed. Notably, the respondent did not make any claims, indicating a possible lack of contest or a waiver of further disputes. This …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!