| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive real estate market, potential buyers often seek to understand the reputation of builders before making significant investments. This blog post delves into the legal landscape of Pushpatinath Builders and Developers, highlighted by a series of legal challenges that have painted a concerning picture for current and future clients.
Overview of Legal Issues
Pushpatinath Builders and Developers has faced a total of 10 complaints, all of which have resulted in losses for the builder. The consistent pattern in these legal challenges revolves around claims from buyers regarding possession of properties. A recurring theme is that applicants claim to have paid between 85-95% of the total payment for their properties, yet they have not received possession as promised. The builder's argument has been centered around alleged non-receipt of full payments and unforeseen delays.
Patterns in Lost Cases
The builder has lost all 10 cases filed against them. Here …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Pushpatinath Builders and Developers, which it lost, revealed several key themes across all the cases. The primary disputes can be categorized into three main topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Disputes over Payment Completion, and the defense of Unforeseen Circumstances.
The majority of the cases revolve around Delayed Possession Claims. In each instance, the applicants claimed to have paid between 85-95% of the agreed payment, yet they faced a lack of possession of the promised property. These cases highlight a significant pattern where buyers expressed dissatisfaction where possession was not granted promptly after substantial payments had been made.
Disputes over Payment Completion emerged as another common theme. The builder consistently claimed that full payment had not been received from the applicants, which led to a defense of delayed possession due to insufficient funds to complete projects on schedule. However, the verdicts did …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!