| CIN | L72300TN1991PLC020122 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | KRM Centre, 9th Floor, Door No. 2 Harrington Road, Chetpet , Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India - 600031 |
| Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding PVP Ventures Limited: A Detailed Overview for Homebuyers
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount for securing your dream home. One such builder is PVP Ventures Limited, based in Tamil Nadu. This blog post provides insights into PVP Ventures Limited, examining their performance through complaints and legal cases, and offering guidance for potential buyers.
Builder Profile: PVP Ventures Limited
PVP Ventures Limited has garnered attention due to its activities in the Tamil Nadu region. However, the builder has faced scrutiny, as evidenced by one legal complaint filed against them, which they lost. Understanding the implications of this complaint is crucial for potential buyers.
Legal Case Overview
Summary of Legal Case
The case against PVP Ventures Limited revolved around a resident association's claims that the builder had failed to provide essential amenities and services. The complaints included:
- Lack of underground sewerage and drainage systems.
- Absence …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against PVP Ventures Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects. The cases highlight two primary topics: disputes over amenities and services, and claims of financial mismanagement.
The first theme, amenities and services disputes, encompasses a range of issues, including the promised but unfulfilled provision of underground sewerage and drainage, potable water connections, and solid waste management. The complainants, often representing associations of flat owners, claimed that the builder had failed to deliver essential facilities for a comfortable and hygienic living environment. In response, the builder contended that they had provided necessary amenities, such as sewerage treatment plants and water supply treatment plants, but the evidence apparently did not meet the expectations or requirements of the complainants or the authority overseeing the case.
The second theme involves financial mismanagement claims, where the builder was accused …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!