R R CONSTRUCTION

CIN	Not Available
Year Established	Not Available
Address	Not Available
Company Status	Not Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Overview of R R Construction

R R Construction is a builder operating primarily in the state of Gujarat. Despite having only one recorded complaint against them, it's important to analyze the details surrounding their legal history to better understand their reputation and reliability as a construction provider.

Legal Case Details

In terms of legal interactions:

R R Construction has faced one complaint.
They have won zero cases in court, which raises a flag about their ability to address grievances effectively.
The builder lost one case, which is noteworthy because it highlights potential issues with project execution or client relations.

Interestingly, one case against them was withdrawn by the complainant, suggesting that there could have been a resolution outside of a formal court ruling, though specifics on the claims were not provided.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases Lost

The details provided indicate that R R Construction has a lost case. Without …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. Includes summaries and key takeaways.

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics

Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Disputes over Land Conversion or Classification Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against R R Construction, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved.

The cases can be broadly categorized into four types: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays. Each of these categories highlights significant areas of concern regarding the builder's operational practices and adherence to regulatory frameworks.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for delays, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over land classification. For instance, many complaints revolved around the builder's failure to deliver units within the promised timelines, leading to claims of delayed possession. Similarly, non-compliance with municipal orders created friction, particularly when the builder did not adhere to required project modifications or timelines, resulting in legal action.