No Logo Available

R. S. PROCON

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When considering a builder for your next property investment, it's crucial to assess their legal standing and customer complaints. In this blog post, we will closely examine R. S. Procon, a builder operating exclusively in Gujarat. We'll explore the legal challenges they have faced, the outcomes of these cases, and what potential buyers should keep in mind.

Overview of R. S. Procon

R. S. Procon is a builder located in Gujarat with a limited track record in legal cases against them. Notably, they have garnered one complaint, which has resulted in one lost case. This record presents some significant points of concern for potential buyers.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Filed Against R. S. Procon

In the sole case that R. S. Procon lost, pertinent details reveal a violation of the RERA Act. The complaint centered around the appellant's claim that R. S. Procon collected more than 10% of the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with RERA Act Project Takeover Disputes Regulatory Violations

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder R. S. Procon, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around three critical areas: non-compliance with the RERA Act, project takeover disputes, and regulatory violations.

The non-compliance with the RERA Act was a significant theme, where the builder was accused of collecting more than 10% of the amount from buyers without registering the agreement for sale, as mandated by Section 13(1) of the RERA Act. This highlights a troubling pattern of ignoring regulatory requirements, which is a common trigger for litigation in real estate transactions.

Project takeover disputes also emerged as a theme. In one case, the builder claimed that they had taken over the project from a previous promoter who had not registered agreements for sale. While this indicates an attempt to deflect responsibility, it also raises concerns about the builder's due diligence during …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review