CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the bustling real estate market of Gujarat, potential buyers often seek reliable developers to invest in their future homes. One such builder in this region is RADHE DEVELOPERS. In this post, we will explore the builder's legal standing through their complaint record and cases involving the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA).
RADHE DEVELOPERS has engaged in multiple real estate projects, specifically in the state of Gujarat. Despite their initiatives in the market, they have been subject to legal scrutiny based on complaints lodged against them. This blog post will analyze the outcomes of the legal cases tied to the builder and identify any patterns affecting their reputation.
Currently, RADHE DEVELOPERS has faced two recorded complaints, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. The details of these cases provide insight into common patterns in legal disputes concerning this developer:
Interestingly, RADHE DEVELOPERS has no recorded cases that they won. All documented legal disputes ended in losses for the builder, signifying a potential trend of ineffective legal defenses or lapses in their operational practices.
With a total of two complaints and no favorable outcomes, RADHE DEVELOPERS presents a concerning picture for potential investors. The developer has demonstrated a lack of compliance with crucial legal requirements, which could lead to broader implications for customers in terms of project reliability and transparency.
In sum, while RADHE DEVELOPERS is an active player in the Gujarat real estate market, the current statistics regarding complaints and legal cases indicate a trend of regulatory challenges. Potential buyers should exercise caution and conduct detailed research before making investment decisions in projects undertaken by this builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against RADHE DEVELOPERS, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their dealings with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and project stakeholders. The cases highlight two primary themes: non-compliance with the RERA Act and project delay/reporting issues, along with a notable violation in advertising projects.
The first type of cases revolve around the builder's failure to adhere to the RERA Act, particularly concerning project reporting and advertising. In one case, the builder was penalized for not submitting the final project report for 'The Earning Point' after the completion date had passed, demonstrating an breach in regulatory compliance. The reason commonly cited for these cases was the builder's inability to fulfill their obligations, which reflects a broader pattern of neglecting procedural requirements that RERA imposes to protect consumers and maintain transparency.
Project delays attributed to various reasons also stand out as a theme in these cases. Builders often find themselves in litigation over delays, which may stem from unforeseen circumstances, as claimed by RADHE DEVELOPERS, or from errors in reporting that obscure the actual project timelines. This highlights a common trigger for litigation, where builders may dispute the characterization of their delays or the penalties imposed for late project deliveries.
The builder's losses in these cases primarily arise from insufficient evidence to justify their actions, or a failure to comply with clear regulatory requirements. In the case of the project report delay, RADHE DEVELOPERS cited unforeseen circumstances, yet this defense did not meet the expectations set by RERA for timely reporting. Similarly, their violation of advertising regulations resulted in a significant fine, indicating a misunderstanding or neglect of the legal standards surrounding project promotions.
Overall, these cases underscore the importance of compliance within the real estate framework, highlighting radical differences between builders who adhere to regulations and those who do not. Buyers should take note of these patterns, as they suggest potential risks regarding transparency and reliability when dealing with builders that have a history of legal disputes and regulatory violations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
257/2019 | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority fine… | ["RERA registration… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Radhe Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1hNmmE-pJMAaZs9zQnFoq2LF5JCuee1GH |
GJ/CMP/NCQR/JUNAGAD… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority file… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Radhe Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1YTb-RV9U17j7SdnpSxeAci8WXYSJ9LpY |