CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When searching for a reliable builder, potential homeowners often seek insights into a builder's reputation and legal history. RADHESHYAM DEVELOPERS, operating primarily in Gujarat, provides an interesting case study with a mix of complaints and legal verdicts. This post delves into the builder's performance based on the limited available data.
RADHESHYAM DEVELOPERS has faced two complaints, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. The legal issues center around the timely submission of required documents, specifically annual audit reports, which underlines the builder's challenges in compliance.
The pattern evident in the two lost cases clearly indicates a poor track record concerning compliance with submission deadlines and proper documentation. It reflects potential organizational issues within RADHESHYAM DEVELOPERS, pointing towards their need for improved administrative practices to ensure timely reporting as required by law.
Despite the outcomes of the cases they lost, it's noteworthy that RADHESHYAM DEVELOPERS did manage to contest these cases legally. This suggests that the builder may have a framework for handling disputes and may still be striving to ensure adherence to regulatory requirements, even if they haven't succeeded thus far.
Upon reviewing the complaints and legal outcomes involving RADHESHYAM DEVELOPERS, potential buyers should approach this builder with caution. The builder has faced setbacks in compliance, leading to fines, which might raise concerns about their operational standards and reliability.
By staying informed and vigilant, potential homebuyers can navigate the complexities of property purchasing and make choices that are conducive to their long-term satisfaction.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Radheshyam Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around the builder's non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Act), particularly concerning the timely submission of annual audit reports.
The first type of case involves penalties for delayed submissions of these reports. In one instance, the builder was fined Rs. 15,000 for failing to submit the annual audit report on time, as mandated by the RERA Act. This highlights a pattern where the builder faced legal repercussions due to insufficient adherence to regulatory deadlines.
Another case exhibited similar characteristics, where the builder was again accused of not submitting the annual audit report for the financial year 2018-19. Although the builder claimed to have submitted the report, which was allegedly not accepted, the outcome resulted in a more severe penalty of 5% of the estimated cost of the project. This shows a trend in which disputes often center around the builder's accountability for maintaining proper documentation and compliance with the RERA Act.
The common triggers for these legal actions include the builder's failure to fulfill regulatory requirements and their inability to provide accepted documentation on time. The reasons the builder lost these cases primarily revolve around their non-compliance with the RERA Act and the subsequent failure to meet the expectations set during the regulatory process.
Overall, these cases underscore the importance of adhering to legal standards in real estate development and the potential financial and reputational costs that builders may incur when they fail to do so.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suo-Moto 150/R Case… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority fine… | ["Non-compliance wi… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Radheshyam Develope… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1e5ldDeXxdGn3syJl0b3Ghaa8wKI11xIr |
GJ/CMP/NCAR/JUNAGAD… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority fine… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Radheshyam Develope… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1a2hdmdLbUT7QTdqN_TEtisa05WtwWC51 |