No Logo Available

RADHEY KRISHNA TEXHNO BUILD PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Uttar Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the ever-evolving real estate market, the reputation of a builder can significantly influence buyer confidence. This blog post delves into the performance of RADHEY KRISHNA TEXHNO BUILD Private Limited, a builder predominantly active in Uttar Pradesh, as reflected in their legal history and customer interactions.

Company Overview

Name: RADHEY KRISHNA TEXHNO BUILD Private Limited
Project Location: Uttar Pradesh
Legal Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1

Legal Case Analysis

Overview of Legal Cases

RADHEY KRISHNA TEXHNO BUILD has been subjected to one legal dispute, which they unfortunately lost. Here's a brief look at the details:

  1. Case Filed by Applicant: The applicant claimed defects had been rectified by the builder.
  2. Builder's Defense: The builder responded, arguing that the applicant had not provided sufficient information regarding their claim.
  3. Verdict: The outcome directed the applicant to provide certain documentation to the respondent, indicating that procedural issues may have impacted the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Insufficient Information Claims Delay Condensation Appeals Defect Removal Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against RADHEY KRISHNA TEXHNO BUILD Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: insufficient information claims, delay condensation appeals, and defect removal disputes.

Many of the claims made by the applicants revolved around the builder's failure to provide adequate information regarding project details, delays, or removal of defects. This lack of transparency created a significant concern for the applicants, who often found themselves unable to ascertain the status of their investments. The builder's recurrent failure to furnish necessary documents or explanations resulted in rulings against them, as seen in the case where the applicant claimed that defects had been removed, yet the builder contested this by stating that insufficient information was provided.

Many cases also dealt with delay condensation appeals, where the builder sought to justify or overturn penalties imposed due …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review