No Logo Available

RADHEY SHELTERS PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Uttar Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, builder reputation can significantly influence potential buyers' decisions. One such builder is Radhey Shelters Private Limited, primarily operating in Uttar Pradesh. This blog explores Radhey Shelters Private Limited, looking at their legal track record, challenges faced, and insights for prospective buyers.

Legal Overview

Radhey Shelters Private Limited has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which resulted in dismissals in favor of the builder. Interestingly, the complaints shared common themes that are worth analyzing.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Patterns in Cases Lost

Radhey Shelters has encountered two cases, where both claims revolved around the registration of their project under the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UPRERA). The appellants contended that the project was not registered with UPRERA, thus arguing that the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 should apply to them. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Project Registration Issues Regulatory Non-compliance Disputes over Legal Provisions

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Radhey Shelters Private Limited, from which the builder emerged victorious, revealed several key themes regarding the disputes that frequently arise. The cases can primarily be grouped into three categories: Project Registration Issues, Regulatory Non-compliance, and Disputes over Legal Provisions.

The claims filed by appellants often centered on the assertion that Radhey Shelters' project was not registered with the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UPRERA), thereby arguing that the provisions of the Act 2016 should not apply to the project. The builder, on the other hand, defended itself by explaining that the project was completed before the enactment of the Act 2016, making the regulatory provisions inapplicable. This recurring theme points to a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the legal context by the opposing parties, focusing primarily on the compliance aspect of the project registration.

These cases were brought …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review