| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering the purchase of a property, it is crucial to examine the track record of the builders you are evaluating. In this blog post, we delve into Radhika Construction, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, analyzing their legal history and performance in complaints, focusing on the outcomes of their cases.
Legal Case Overview
Radhika Construction has faced a total of four complaints. Out of these complaints, the builder has had a mixed record with one case won and three cases lost. The outcomes highlight important insight into the builder's competency and adherence to regulatory obligations.
Summary of Legal Cases
- Cases where the builder filed and lost (2 cases):
- In the first case, Radhika Construction claimed it had not submitted the annual audit reports due to technical issues. However, the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Gujrera) found this argument insufficient, imposing a fine of Rs. 40,000 …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Radhika Construction that it lost reveals several key points across the spectrum of its legal disputes. The cases highlight two primary themes: regulatory compliance issues and delays in submitting mandatory reports.
In terms of regulatory compliance, the builder faced penalties due to its failure to adhere to the requirements set forth by the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority. Specifically, the case noted that Radhika Construction did not submit the annual audit report for the financial year 2020-21 within the stipulated time frame, which led to a penalty of Rs. 50,000. This instance underscores a pattern where builders may face legal repercussions due to insufficient adherence to regulatory standards and timelines, highlighting the importance of compliance in the real estate sector.
The reason people commonly bring such cases to court often revolves around the builder’s failure to fulfill obligations that are crucial for …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by Radhika Construction, which it lost, revealed key insights about the disputes and reasons behind the outcomes. The cases primarily revolve around two common themes: non-compliance with regulatory requirements and penalties for reporting failures.
The first theme, "Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements," encompasses cases where Radhika Construction failed to adhere to the stipulations laid out by the RERA Act. For instance, they claimed that the lack of timely submission of audit reports was due to technical issues. However, the findings indicated that the builder did not fulfill its obligations within the legally prescribed time frame.
The second theme focuses specifically on "Fines for Reporting Failures." Here, Radhika Construction often contested the penalties levied against them for not submitting required reports. Despite attempting to argue the non-submission as an honest oversight, authorities maintained that these failures constituted significant violations of the regulations. Consequently, they faced fines, such …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Radhika Construction, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases can be grouped into two main themes:
- Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements: This theme encapsulates disputes where Radhika Construction was taken to task for not adhering to necessary regulatory frameworks, such as submitting mandatory reports related to their projects.
- Penalties for Project Delays: Although not explicitly detailed in the summaries, this theme resonates with potential issues of delays and the resultant penalties that builders might face, particularly from clients or regulatory bodies contesting the timeliness of project completions.
The reasons behind bringing these cases to court primarily included contesting penalties and accusations of regulatory non-compliance. Complaints were likely fueled by buyers' frustrations over perceived failings in project management or regulatory adherence.
Several patterns emerged from the cases: Many complaints stemmed from …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!