RADIANCE FACILITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate and property management, choosing the right builder can be a daunting task for potential buyers. Today, we delve into the performance of Radiance Facility Management Services Private Limited, a builder operating in Tamil Nadu, by analyzing their complaints history and legal case outcomes.

Overview of Complaints

Radiance Facility Management has recorded 8 complaints against them. Out of these, they have successfully won 1 case, while 7 cases resulted in losses. This ratio raises a flag for potential home buyers who might be considering investing in properties developed or managed by this builder.

Legal Case Details

Cases Lost

The builder lost a case where the appellant claimed that the former secretary had not handed over crucial documents to the current elected association, and sought to include him as a necessary party for the case. The respondents, representing Radiance Facility Management, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Radiance Facility Management Services Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder.

The cases primarily revolved around three critical themes: non-compliance with the environment clearance certificate, failure to provide requisite maintenance services, and inadequate provisions for water and sewerage connections. In each case, the complainants alleged that the builder had failed to complete the project in accordance with the environmental regulations and neglected maintenance duties. The builder, on the other hand, consistently claimed compliance and adequate service provision, yet the verdicts did not favor their position.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: the primary trigger for litigation in these cases was the builder’s failure to meet regulatory requirements and fulfill their commitments to homeowners regarding maintenance and amenities. This suggests a systemic issue where the builder may have prioritized completion and …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around issues such as not handing over key documents to elected associations, the role of former association officials in ongoing complaints, and disagreements on necessary parties in legal proceedings. Parties raised grievances often asserting that previous secretaries failed to fulfill their duties, which led to calls for inclusion in disputes that ultimately could have been decided without their involvement. This trend highlights a noteworthy point of contention, as many of these disputes were linked to the administrative responsibilities within the housing associations rather than the fundamental actions of the builder themselves.

The reasons behind bringing these cases to court primarily involved contests over penalties and the need for certain individuals to be implicated in ongoing disputes, with opposing parties frequently alleging oversight or negligence. However, it's evident from the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis