CIN | U45400MH1993PTC074368 |
---|---|
Year Established | 6-Oct-93 |
Address | 3rd Floor Taj Buliding 210 DN Road Mumbai Mumbai City MH 400001 IN |
Company Status | Private |
In the constantly evolving world of real estate, the reputation of builders becomes crucial for potential buyers. One such builder in the spotlight is Radiant Hotels Private Limited, a company that has faced numerous legal challenges and complaints from consumers. This article provides an in-depth look at the complaints lodged against Radiant Hotels, results of legal cases, and advice for potential home buyers.
The cases against Radiant Hotels reflect a pattern of consumer dissatisfaction, primarily revolving around issues related to delays in project completions and refunds for properties. Here’s a summary of the case outcomes:
The repeated losses in court can be attributed to several recurring themes:
Interestingly, despite the overall results suggesting a failing track record, there are a few wins where the builder has managed to have complaints dismissed. Most notably:
Based on the analyzed data, Radiant Hotels Private Limited emerges as a builder with considerable challenges. With all ten legal cases resulting in losses and significant consumer complaints primarily revolving around refunds and regulatory violations, potential buyers should exercise caution.
In summary, while Radiant Hotels has impressive branding, the data indicates a serious need for potential buyers to tread carefully. Engaging with a builder that has a solid track record and clear communication can save buyers from future disappointments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Radiant Hotels Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common disputes faced by the builder. The cases can be broadly categorized into four themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Refund Disputes, Non-Compliance with RERA, and Penalties for Project Delays.
Many of the cases revolved around delayed possession claims, where buyers complained about not receiving their villas on time. For instance, in one case, the complainants sought a refund of Rs. 2,16,45,100 along with compensation for the delay. The builder's defense often attributed delays to unforeseen circumstances, but this did not stand in court, leading to significant compensation awards against the builder.
Refund disputes emerged as another major theme. In multiple cases, buyers claimed that they were entitled to refunds due to the builder's failure to deliver properties as promised. The builder's registration with RERA was often cited as a reason why refunds should not be granted, yet the authority repeatedly directed the builder to refund substantial amounts within specified timelines, indicating a lack of understanding or compliance with RERA regulations on the builder's part.
The builder was also penalized several times for non-compliance with the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act (RERA). Violations included accepting more than 10% of the sale consideration without a written agreement for sale and failing to register projects with the authority. These infractions highlight a systematic issue within the builder's operations and regulatory compliance practices.
Finally, penalties for project delays were a common outcome in many cases. The builder faced penalties for failing to complete projects on time, which further illustrates their difficulty in meeting contractual obligations and adherence to timelines set forth in their agreements with buyers.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: the builder’s litigation often stems from a combination of delays in possession delivery, issues related to refunds, and a general lack of compliance with RERA. Common triggers for these disputes include the builder's inability to fulfill promises made at sale, inadequate documentation, and a failure to respond adequately to buyer concerns.
The reasons for the builder's losses in these cases are multifaceted. Insufficient evidence to defend their positions, non-compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and failure to adhere to interim directions from authorities all played roles in the outcomes. Furthermore, the builder's repeated misunderstandings of RERA rules and their implications for project delivery and refunds resulted in significant financial penalties and reputational damage. Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for buyers to conduct thorough due diligence on builders, particularly regarding their compliance history and previous legal disputes, before making any purchase decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAJRERA-C-2017-2061 | Rajasthan | Complainants sought refund of Rs. 2,16,45,100/- w… | ["Refund", "Compens… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha… | Hiren P Busa | Radiant Hotels Priv… | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/Kajal Lalit1 001-converted (1).pdf |
RAJ RERA-C-2017-२061 | Rajasthan | Complainants Kajal Lalit Muthreja and others file… | ["Refund", "RERA"] | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "The complainants … | others | Radiant Hotels Priv… | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/Kajal.pdf |
F.3(1240)RAJIRERAQP… | Rajasthan | The Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority is… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The Authority claimed that t… | Rajasthan Real Esta… | Radiant Hotels Priv… | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/6859F.3(1240).pdf |
F. ३(४२६)RJIRERA/PI… | Rajasthan | The real estate project registered with the Autho… | ["Real estate proje… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "", "… | Radiant Hotels Priv… | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/9564F.3(426).pdf | |
RAJ RERA-C-2021-4602 | Rajasthan | The complainants booked a villa in the Urban Wood… | ["Refund", "Compens… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed ref… | Mr. Kajal Lalit Mut… | Radiant Hotels Priv… | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/20432021-4602.pdf |