CIN | AAC-2802 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 18/A, SARDAR PATEL CO. OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, OPP. MUKT JIVAN SWAMINARAYANA MANDIR, MANINAGAR AHMEDABD, Gujarat, India - 380008 |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream project, understanding their legal history can be crucial for making informed decisions. Raghav Conpro LLP, operating in Gujarat, has faced a number of legal challenges that shed light on their operational practices.
Legal Landscape of Raghav Conpro LLP
Raghav Conpro LLP has encountered a total of 4 legal complaints throughout its existence, resulting in an equal split of victories and losses—2 cases won and 2 cases lost. Analyzing the legal history reveals important insights into their business practices.
Cases Lost by Raghav Conpro LLP
- Case Filed and Lost:
In one instance, the appellants claimed that Raghav Conpro LLP failed to submit the annual audit report due to unforeseen circumstances. However, the respondent successfully argued that the construction firm did not comply with the deadline for the submission, leading to the project's withdrawal and de-registration.
…
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Raghav Conpro LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight key issues primarily revolving around non-compliance with the RERA Act, delays in project reporting, and the builder's attempts to withdraw or de-register their projects.
The first theme, non-compliance with the RERA Act, stands out in the case of the 'Taxsheela Metro Industrial Park.' The appellant claimed that the builder failed to submit the final project report on time, which is a clear violation of the provisions set out in the RERA Act. This highlights a pattern where builders may face legal challenges due to insufficient adherence to regulatory requirements.
Delays in project reporting and reporting compliance emerge as another significant theme. Builders are required to maintain transparency and meet deadlines for submitting reports on their projects. The case against Raghav Conpro LLP indicates that a failure to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by Raghav Conpro LLP, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the nature of their disputes and the patterns associated with these legal battles.
One prominent theme emerging from the cases is 'Regulatory Compliance Issues.' This domain encompasses situations where the builder was unable to meet the necessary regulatory requirements, particularly evident in their failure to submit the annual audit report within the stipulated timeframe. Such failures not only demonstrate negligence in adhering to norms but also raise concerns regarding transparency and accountability.
Another critical category identified is 'Project Documentation Failures.' This includes claims related to the submission of essential documentation that underpins project legitimacy and compliance. Raghav Conpro LLP's inability to present timely and necessary documentation has led to unfavorable judicial outcomes, indicating a pattern where lacking proper project records can jeopardize a builder's standing.
The third theme, 'Unforeseen Circumstances Impacts,' highlights …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Raghav Conpro LLP, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into two primary themes: Project Withdrawal and De-registration, and Disputes over Annual Audit Reports.
In the first theme, the builder encountered situations where they withdrew a project and had it de-registered. This was often contested by opposing parties who raised claims about regulatory compliance or fund allocation. In a notable case, the builder successfully contended that withdrawing a project was within their rights, and thus no further action was taken against them for not providing annual audit reports—possession of such reports can be heavily contested depending on the circumstances surrounding project execution and regulatory requirements.
The common reasons driving Raghav Conpro LLP to court included the need to contest penalties imposed on them, to clarify misunderstandings surrounding funds and project timelines, and to address …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Raghav Conpro LLP, which the builder won, revealed some pertinent insights into the nature of disputes within the real estate landscape. These disputes can be grouped under several recurring themes that illustrate the complexities faced by builders in today's market.
- Project Withdrawals and Deregistration: Several claims against Raghav Conpro LLP centered around the builder's alleged failure to submit necessary quarterly reports while violating RERA instructions. However, the builder countered that the project was withdrawn and officially de-registered, meaning there were no active bookings or responsibilities tied to that project, ultimately leading to a favorable verdict for the builder.
- Regulatory Non-compliance Claims: Some cases revolved around allegations of non-compliance with regulatory frameworks that govern the real estate sector. These complaints often stem from a lack of understanding or misinterpretation of the legal requirements that builders are mandated …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!