RAGHULEELA BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 2
- States (Active in): Maharashtra
| CIN | U45200MH2007PTC210593 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 13-Mar-07 |
| Address | UNIT NO. 1112/1113, C-WING, ONE BKC, PLOT NO. C-66 G BLOCK, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI Mumbai City MH 400051 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, home buyers often rely on builders to fulfill their aspirations of owning a dream home. However, some builders face legal challenges that can impact their reputation and customer satisfaction. This blog post delves into Raghuleela Builders Private Limited, based in Maharashtra, to analyze their legal track record and what it could mean for potential buyers.
Legal Performance Overview
Raghuleela Builders Private Limited has faced a challenging legal landscape, with a total of 2 complaints filed against them. Notably, they have lost both cases, which raises important questions about their operational practices and commitment to customer service.
Breakdown of Legal Cases
- Case 1: The appellant claimed non-delivery of possession within the stipulated time, seeking interest payments as compensation. The builder contended that the delay was due to uncontrollable circumstances, but the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing Raghuleela to pay interest based on government lending rates.
- Case 2: The second case involved an applicant seeking to withdraw their application with the option to file relevant documents later. This case had no significant claims against the builder but highlights a procedural aspect rather than a direct challenge to their practices.
Patterns and Analysis
Common Factors in Lost Cases
- Delay in Possession: The most apparent issue leading to the builder's losses is the delay in providing possession of the purchased units. This has significant implications for buyers who are often keen on timelines.
- Customer Claims: Customers appear to have been significantly impacted by the lack of timely possession, which leads to their claims for interest. Such patterns indicate a need for improved communication and delivery timelines from the builder.
Factors Contributing to Won Cases
In the legal cases won by Raghuleela Builders, the outcomes were largely procedural rather than substantive. However, the ruling in the first case where interest was mandated suggests that the builder's efforts to argue uncontrollable delays were not sufficient to sway the tribunal's decision.
Conclusion
Raghuleela Builders Private Limited's legal challenges indicate a troubling trend with customer satisfaction, particularly concerning timely possession. Losing both legal cases raises red flags about their operational efficiency and commitment to fulfilling customer contracts.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research the Builder: Before investing, potential buyers should conduct thorough research on the builder’s history, particularly any legal disputes and outcomes.
- Understand Your Rights: Be informed about your rights as a buyer, especially regarding possession timelines and possible compensation for delays.
- Document Everything: Ensure all agreements are documented and seek legal counsel if needed to navigate contractual obligations.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Review Project History: Look into the builder’s past projects, timelines, and customer feedback.
- Investigate Legal History: Understand any legal issues faced by the builder, as this could reflect their operational practices.
- Engage with Previous Buyers: If possible, speak to past clients to gauge their satisfaction and experiences.
- Read Reviews and Ratings: Utilize online platforms to get a sense of a builder's reputation in the market.
By closely examining the legal journey of Raghuleela Builders, buyers are encouraged to proceed with caution and ensure their investments are protected.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Raghuleela Builders Private Limited, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims and the interest payments associated with these delays.
The most notable theme was the Delayed Possession Claims. In one significant case, the appellant claimed that the builder had failed to hand over possession of the unit within the agreed-upon time frame. The builder, in defense, argued that the delay was caused by unforeseen circumstances beyond their control. However, the tribunal ruled against the builder, directing them to pay interest on the amounts received from the buyer, indicating a failure on the builder's part to meet contractual obligations.
Another theme that emerged, albeit less prominently, was Interest Payment Disputes. This was inherently linked to the delayed possession claims, as the tribunal's verdicts often included directives for interest payments as a means to compensate buyers for the delays. The builder's inability to prevent these disputes from escalating into legal action suggests potential issues in their project management or customer service functions.
The final theme observed was Application Withdrawal, which was markedly different from the other disputes. In this case, the applicant sought to withdraw their application with the liberty to file certified copies of relevant documents later. The absence of any counter claims from the builder and the straightforward disposition of this application indicate that it may have been a procedural step rather than a substantive dispute.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court included contesting delays in project completion, disputing the builder's accountability for these delays, and seeking compensation in the form of interest payments. Buyers seemed to be primarily motivated by the builder's failure to adhere to timelines and agreements, which reflects a pattern of frustration in the purchasing community.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to validate their claims of unforeseen circumstances. Insufficient evidence to support defenses, failure to communicate effectively with buyers regarding project delays, and a lack of compliance with the stipulated timelines ultimately led to legal repercussions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT006000000052727 | Maharashtra | The appellant filed an appeal against the impugne… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Mysore Petro Chemic… | Raghuleela Builders… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1MymCOuDrBBB6ougnbnLVsleg287mAXVG |
| 12AT006000000021462 | Maharashtra | The applicant seeks to withdraw the application w… | ["Withdrawal of app… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant seeks to withd… | Heavy Hydraulics (I… | Raghuleela Builders… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1IJSDSw0ro9OSCl2SUjwPoQ7fbw7Am7QV |