RAHAJU VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED

CIN	Not Available
Year Established	Not Available
Address	Not Available
Company Status	Not Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth purchasing experience. One builder that has been making waves in Chhattisgarh is Rahaju Ventures Private Limited. This blog delves into the builder’s track record, highlighting complaints, legal battles, and what potential buyers should consider before making a purchase.

Builder Overview

Rahaju Ventures Private Limited has a total of 2 complaints lodged against them but has successfully won all 2 cases they were involved in. Impressively, they have not lost any cases, indicating a strong legal standing.

Legal Case Insights

Cases Lost: Understanding the Trends

Interestingly, while Rahaju Ventures has a clean record of not losing cases, the two complaints filed against them involved similar patterns. The appellant claims in both cases centered on the desire to sell a disputed house and the request for the non-applicants to execute a registered sale deed. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. Includes summaries and key insights.

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics

Ban on Purchase and Sale Regulatory Compliance Issues

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolve around the enforcement of bans on the purchase and sale of particular properties and regulatory compliance. The common theme in these cases is the ongoing challenges related to disputed projects, where the permission to sell these units was a central issue. The appellants sought judicial intervention to lift sales restrictions or enforce agreements, while the respondents defended the existing bans based on regulatory frameworks.

The reasons for these cases to be brought to court typically stem from buyers or stakeholders contesting the legality of the sale bans, arguing that they should have the right to execute registered sale deeds despite the existing restrictions. The persistence of these claims also suggests that there may be misunderstandings or misinterpretations regarding the authority's orders or project classifications.