RAHEJA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Understanding RAHEJA DEVELOPERS Private Limited

RAHEJA DEVELOPERS Private Limited has emerged as a significant player in the real estate market, particularly in the regions of Haryana and Gurugram. However, potential buyers should approach their projects with caution, given the company's track record in legal disputes.

Complaints Overview

The builder has recorded a total of 998 complaints against them. Out of these, they have won 73 cases while losing a staggering 925 cases, indicating a troubling discrepancy in their legal outcomes. It's clear that the issues surrounding this builder are both widespread and serious.

Common Factors in Lost Cases

1. Non-Compliance with Timelines: Instances where complainants claimed that the builder failed to deliver possession of flats or properties within the stipulated timeframes. The ruling authorities frequently sided with the complainants, emphasizing that delays were unjustifiable and violated section 11(4)(a) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
2. Inadequate Infrastructure: Many …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Raheja Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common themes and patterns emerging from these disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, refunds for non-completion of projects, disputes over project completion and handover, interest payment delays, non-compliance with RERA regulations, and compensation for mental harassment and agony.

Many of the cases involve delayed possession claims, where buyers sought refunds or compensation due to the builder's failure to deliver units within the stipulated timelines. The reasons for these delays vary; however, the builder frequently attributed them to circumstances beyond their control, such as infrastructure issues, force majeure events, and delays in obtaining necessary approvals.

Refunds for non-completion of projects constitute another large group of cases. Here, buyers sought to recover their investments when projects were not completed as promised. The …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

The analysis of the cases filed by RAHEJA DEVELOPERS Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals insights into recurring disputes and litigation themes that define their legal challenges.

Firstly, most cases grouped under 'Non-compliance with Regulatory Provisions' indicate a pattern of frequent disputes related to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The builder's claims often revolved around asserting their compliance with the Act, but courts repeatedly dismissed these claims due to insufficient evidence or failure to meet legal requirements. In several instances, the builder sought to withdraw their appeals altogether, reinforcing a theme of struggle against the landscape of regulatory frameworks governing real estate.

Another distinct category includes cases labeled 'Withdrawal of Appeals.' Here, many instances show that the builder chose to withdraw appeals rather than contend with mounting evidence and opposition claims, often citing reasons of compliance issues or procedural oversights rather than substantive grounds. This withdrawal …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, RAHEJA DEVELOPERS Private Limited, which it won, revealed several insightful patterns regarding the nature of disputes and the builder's legal outcomes. The cases can be grouped into a few key themes: 'Delayed Possession Claims,' 'Refund Claims,' 'Interest on Delayed Possession,' 'Compensation for Mental Agony,' and 'Non-compliance with Project Completion Timelines.'

1. Delayed Possession Claims: Many complainants alleged that the builder failed to hand over possession of the flats and shops within the stipulated timelines. This theme is prevalent across numerous cases, indicating a recurring issue with compliance to agreed possession dates. However, the builder often contested these claims by stating that delays were due to unforeseen circumstances.
2. Refund Claims: Numerous cases involved demands for refunds made by buyers who felt wronged due to delays or failure to deliver properties. The outcomes often favored the builder, with the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several key themes that highlight the recurring issues faced by RAHEJA DEVELOPERS Private Limited.

Jurisdictional Disputes

Several cases revolved around disputes related to territorial jurisdiction. Complainants often argued that the projects were within the jurisdiction of specific regulatory authorities, only to face rejections when the builder proved otherwise. This pattern suggests a frequent misunderstanding among complainants regarding jurisdiction boundaries.

Failure to Appear in Court

A notable number of cases were dismissed due to the complainants' failure to appear in court. This highlights a trend where complainants either did not take the legal proceedings seriously or lacked sufficient commitment to pursue their claims, leading to automatic dismissals and showing judicial reluctance to entertain cases with non-compliance from plaintiffs.

Refund and Financial Disputes

…

Unlock Full Report & Analysis