RAHUL ASSOCIATES logo

RAHUL ASSOCIATES

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When it comes to choosing a builder for your future home, past performance and reputation play a significant role in ensuring a smooth buying process. This blog post takes a closer look at Rahul Associates, a builder operating in Tamil Nadu, and analyzes their track record based on complaints and legal cases.

Overview of Rahul Associates

Rahul Associates is a builder with a limited number of complaints and a strong record of handling legal matters. With just one complaint filed against them, they have successfully won their case and have no recorded losses in any other incidents, indicating a favorable reputation in the industry.

Legal Case Details

Summary of the Complaint

A single legal case was filed against Rahul Associates, which revolved around:

  • Issue: Defects and deficiency of services in Flat No.E, First floor in Rahul Vaidheeswarar Flats, Ambattur.
  • Builder’s Argument: The flat was handed over to the complainant …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Defects and Deficiency of Services Regulatory Compliance and RERA Exemptions

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Rahul Associates, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes centered around two main themes: Defects and Deficiency of Services, and Regulatory Compliance and RERA Exemptions.

In the case reviewed, the appellant claimed there were defects and deficiencies in the services provided for Flat No.E, First floor in Rahul Vaidheeswarar Flats, Ambattur.

The builder successfully defended against this claim by noting that the flat had been handed over prior to the enactment of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, placing the complaint outside the ambit of RERA.

These cases were brought to court primarily because of allegations related to service inadequacies and compliance with regulatory requirements. The emerging pattern suggests that buyers often contest the quality of services received, and in this instance, the buyer's claims were rendered ineffective due to the timing of the handover in …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review