CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When it comes to choosing a builder for your future home, past performance and reputation play a significant role in ensuring a smooth buying process. This blog post takes a closer look at Rahul Associates, a builder operating in Tamil Nadu, and analyzes their track record based on complaints and legal cases.
Rahul Associates is a builder with a limited number of complaints and a strong record of handling legal matters. With just one complaint filed against them, they have successfully won their case and have no recorded losses in any other incidents, indicating a favorable reputation in the industry.
A single legal case was filed against Rahul Associates, which revolved around:
This case reflects a specific pattern where complaints arise from the perception of service deficiencies; however, Rahul Associates successfully navigated this situation by leveraging the timing of the handover relative to the regulatory framework.
Based on the provided data, Rahul Associates appears to be a stable and reliable builder, with a strong handle on their legal obligations. While there was one complaint regarding service deficiencies, the builder’s successful defense suggests that they maintain a solid understanding of regulatory boundaries and client service expectations.
If you are considering purchasing a property from Rahul Associates, keep the following tips in mind:
In conclusion, knowledge is power when making a significant financial decision like purchasing a home. Investigating your potential builders like Rahul Associates is essential in ensuring a satisfactory purchasing experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Rahul Associates, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes centered around two main themes: Defects and Deficiency of Services, and Regulatory Compliance and RERA Exemptions.
In the case reviewed, the appellant claimed there were defects and deficiencies in the services provided for Flat No.E, First floor in Rahul Vaidheeswarar Flats, Ambattur.
The builder successfully defended against this claim by noting that the flat had been handed over prior to the enactment of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, placing the complaint outside the ambit of RERA.
These cases were brought to court primarily because of allegations related to service inadequacies and compliance with regulatory requirements. The emerging pattern suggests that buyers often contest the quality of services received, and in this instance, the buyer's claims were rendered ineffective due to the timing of the handover in relation to RERA’s jurisdiction.
The builder's success can be attributed to several factors. In this case, the defense hinged on the legal technicality that the complaints fell outside the relevant regulatory framework. The builder excelled in providing sufficient defense against claims, often demonstrating that the accusations were either ill-timed or lacked substantial evidence. This highlights a potential trend where buyers may sometimes misinterpret or misapply the regulatory laws governing property transactions, particularly in relation to the timescales of handovers and the applicable legislation.
From this analysis, it becomes evident that Rahul Associates has a commendable track record in defending itself against unjust claims. The broader real estate market can exhibit instances of buyers making false accusations against builders, highlighting the necessity for due diligence in understanding the specifics of agreements, transaction timelines, and applicable regulations.
In conclusion, potential buyers should be aware of the importance of making informed decisions. While legitimate disputes certainly exist within the real estate market, the successful outcomes for builders like Rahul Associates indicate that they can often effectively counter unjustified claims. Potential buyers are encouraged to approach any claims with caution and seek verified information before establishing an opinion about a builder's reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C.No.335/2019 | Tamil Nadu | Complaint against defects and deficiency of servi… | ["RERA", "flat defe… | {"appellant_claim": "Defects and deficiency of se… | Thiru S. Seshadri | Rahul Associates | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2019/335-2019.pdf |