| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the ever-evolving real estate market, the choice of a builder is a crucial decision that can significantly affect your investment and living experience. Raidhani Land Promoters Private Limited is one such player in the industry. However, an examination of their legal standing reveals a concerning trend that prospective buyers should consider before making a purchase. This blog post will delve into the legal history of Raidhani Land Promoters and provide insights for potential buyers.
Legal Case Analysis
Raidhani Land Promoters has encountered legal challenges, evidenced by two complaints filed against them. Both cases resulted in losses for the builder, indicating a potential pattern of issues in compliance with regulatory standards.
Case Summaries
The details of the two cases are as follows:
- Case One:
- Appellant Claim: The complainant alleged that the respondent's demand for additional funds violated Section 15(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 and …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by Raidhani Land Promoters Private Limited, where the builder faced defeats, reveals significant insights into their recurrent disputes and the legal challenges they encountered.
These cases can be grouped into a few common themes that highlight the nature of the builder's claims and the reactions from other parties involved. The predominant themes identified include Regulatory Compliance Issues, Disputes Over Additional Funding, and Legal Proceedings involving Resolution Plans.
In the first theme, Regulatory Compliance Issues were pivotal, as the builder repeatedly contended that demands from respondents, particularly regarding additional funds, were in contravention of legal provisions such as Section 15(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This line of argument points to an underlying concern of compliance with statutory requirements, which became a central element of their litigation.
The second theme, Disputes Over Additional Funding, was prevalent as the builder argued against …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!