
CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of real estate development, choosing the right builder can be a daunting task for potential homebuyers. One builder that has drawn attention in Rajasthan is the Raj Aangan Society. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of Raj Aangan Society, focusing on the builder's legal track record, common patterns in their cases, and tips for potential buyers.
Overview of Raj Aangan Society
Raj Aangan Society operates exclusively in Rajasthan and has been involved in only one legal complaint to date. Unfortunately, this complaint did not end in their favor, resulting in a lost case. This paints an initial cautionary picture for potential buyers considering engaging with Raj Aangan Society.
Legal Case Details
Cases Won
Raj Aangan Society has not won any cases, as reflected in its legal standing. This absence of victories signals potential challenges concerning their project execution and adherence to regulations.
Cases Lost
…
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Raj Aangan Society that it lost has revealed critical insights into the recurring disputes and themes surrounding its operations.
- Common Amenities Disputes: One prominent theme emerges from the cases regarding disputes over common amenity areas. The specific case summarized highlights a complaint from a society claiming that the builder developed a new project on land assigned for common amenities. Such disputes typically arise when multiple parties have conflicting interests over shared spaces, leading to significant tension and litigation.
- Jurisdiction Issues: Another noteworthy theme is the jurisdictional concerns that reflect tension between builders and regulatory authorities. The cases suggest that builders may contest the authority's competency to adjudicate disputes arising from projects that are non-registered. In the specific case referenced, the builder claimed that the project development predated relevant legislation, arguing against the applicability of the Act. …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!